|
Copy List
GP alleging violation of rights to sue State over
fluoridation
(The Irish Examiner, 20th
September, 2001)
Dr. Andrew Rynne is to sue the Irish
Government for continuing fluoridation, claiming it constitutes a breach of
his human rights.
Under Irish Law, medicine is only permitted
to be administered without consent to those who are mentally ill or by
direction of a court or guardian where the patient is a junior.
"every day of
his life he is medicated without his consent."
Dr. Andrew Rynne
Dr Rynne stated: "every day of his life he
is medicated without his consent."
The Irish Medical Board, which is
responsible for licensing medicinal products is cited as co-defendant in the
case.
Ireland is the only country in Europe that
has compulsory fluoridation.
Part of Dr Rynne's case will rely upon the
very first words of the "Nuremberg Principles" to stop medical experiments
on the people without their consent.
The Nuremberg Principles state:
"The voluntary consent of the human
subject is absolutely essential."
The Australian Government is a signatory to
the Nuremberg Principles plus the fact that Australian Law prohibits doctors
forcing any medication on a patient against their wish.
All these principles are documented and
indeed known to all Australian Parliaments but the politicians with heads in
the sand, ignore an International Principle, that would stop the SALE of
poisonous fluoride pollutants from the chimneys of fertiliser factories, the
U.S.A. fertiliser factories in particular, from where Australia imports that
particular poisonous pollutant for distribution to the Australian
population's drinking water supplies.
The Irish Medical News, 7th September,
2001, presented further evidence of the Irish Government's problem in its
unscientific and anti-democratic promotion of adding a fluoride waste
by-product, a toxic pollutant, in an obvious guise of a necessary daily dose
of such medicine, but the guise fools nobody of honest intelligence.
To further the Government medical problem,
the Irish Doctor points out that those responsible for compulsory artificial
fluoridation have no evidence of fluoridation safety or effectiveness. A
strange medical and pharmaceutical situation controlled by politicians in a
claimed honest democracy.
Dr Rynne itemised the meaning of a medicine
by quoting Justice Lord Jauncey at the Edinburgh Fluoridation Court Case
1983 and the dictionary definition of a medicine:
"A substance taken, usually by mouth, to
treat a disease." And to seal the argument as to whether fluoride is a
medicine, he quotes the definition by the Irish Medical Board:
"Any substance given with a view of
diagnosing, treating or preventing a disease or altering a physiological
function."
He concluded his data in the Irish Medical
News:
"Fluorosilicic acid, the medicine
product that is being dumped into the State's reservoirs, is a recovered
pollution from the phosphate fertiliser industry.
It contains arsenic arid lead and a
i.uhole smorgasbord of other little goodies usually reserved for feeding
rats. They harvest it from the pollution scrubbers in the fertiliser
factory chimney exhaust stacks.
The Irish Medical Board is in serious
breach of its duty of care towards my health and towards the health of
every citizen of this State by allowing an unlicensed and unproven
medicine to be force-fed to all of us."
There seems a large counter attack on the
Irish Government by its population, objecting to compulsory artificial
fluoridation, but will it result in Smiling Irish Eyes, or the usual well
controlled unsatisfactory conclusion to a fluoridation court case?
The interesting factor in the Irish Court
Case by an Irish Doctor, is its mirrored data, that exactly fits the
Australian fluoridation scene, except the State of Victoria, where all the
people's representatives (politicians) in the Parliament, 1993, passed a new
Fluoridation Act, altering the Constitution which now prohibits the
Victorian Supreme Court from involvement in cases about fluoridation. The
protected poison Act by the Victorian Parliament.
It is suggested the Irish Doctor hurries
his court case along, before the Irish Government discovers the disgusting
method adopted by the Victorian Government to prohibit cases on fluoridation
from the Court.
Since that change to the Constitution was
passed by Government, there have been no public objections by the Law
Institute, or any person sitting in Parliament representing the people so
affected.
Where did the usual outspoken teflon
do-gooders and bleeding hearts disappear, possibly to the sand dunes, a
place where they can hide their heads in the sand; and pray to the God, the
three wise (?) monkeys, that see no fluoridation problems, hear no
fluoridation problems and most importantly, speak no evil of fluoridation.
And we still call Australia a democracy!
Copy List
|
