|
Copy List
THE HEROES OF FLUORIDATION HAVE RENEGED
Child guinea pigs.
Strangely only published in the Western
Australian newspaper and not made public in Victoria.
On 18th November, 2001, the Opposition
Education spokesman Phil Honeywood explained the latest Labor Party's fight
to stop tooth decay in children.
He said Victorian school children were
being used as guinea pigs to test a new chewing gum designed to fight
tooth decay.
The experiment is to use 1700 school
children from 27 State Schools in a Government-approved trial of the new
product.
Th schools involved receive $300 for each
student who participates.
"They are being used as guinea pigs
for scientific purposes," Mr. Honeywood said.
The Education Department Manager of School
and Community Development, Sue Tait, said, there was no indication of health
risk; seems the Manager is a prophet of pharmacology.
The gum contains the sugar substitute
aspartame and a milk-based protein called recaldent, thought to fight tooth
decay.
Perhaps the Government Health Minister has
never heard or read about the sugar substitute aspartame, otherwise he needs
urgent help.
However, all that aside, there are
serious aspects relating to (1) Australia's signatory to the Nuremberg Court
conclusions prohibiting experiments on humans, and (2) Australian Law
prohibiting experimental health processes without each person's approval
which is not possible from school children.
That may be as quoted, but the platform of
the Australian Labor Party now in Government in Western Australia, is
compulsory fluoridation to stop tooth decay.
In 1973, the Victorian Labor Party voted
unanimously with the Liberal Party to introduce compulsory fluoridation into
Victoria and guaranteed fluoride in drinking water supplies would stop tooth
decay. (Hansard 9.9.80, 37-11.23)
Now the Government is entering into direct
commercialism in promoting with taxpayer's money, an unproven child dental
treatment to stop tooth decay which they otherwise claim does not exist
because of fluoridation.
Why spend half a million dollars, $500,000,
of taxpayer's money to prove fluoridation is a failure? We give the
information for free in the interests of all, and have done so since the
1973 Fluoridation Act.
Some people will ask why all this has not
been made public in the usual manner, covert action to prove fluoridation is
a failure.
A Royal Commission with very wide Terms of
Reference should be established to examine the scientific evidence against
compulsory artificial fluoridation, the material (fluorides) used and their
source, toxicity, and why such toxic fluoride waste by-product chemical
pollutants are forced onto the people.
Sodium Silicofluoride used in most
world-wide fluoridation plants and delivered to all homes via their kitchen
taps, has never been officially examined pharmaceutically, nor passed as
safe for human consumption in any quantity in any country of the world.
Even in the U.S.A., the home of
fluoridation, and the instigator of fluoridation to rid their fertiliser and
Aluminium Smelters of their toxic mountains of poisonous fluoride chemicals,
which otherwise are prohibited from dumping, except in drinking water
supplies, these fluoride chemicals have never been officially examined
pharmaceutically, nor passed as safe through the U.S. official Government
Food and Drug Administration. During over 50 years of daily drugging their
people, followed by Australia, there has been no Government interest in the
untested, unproven, health safety of fluoridation chemicals.
This conjures up all kinds of interesting
reasons for political intellectually dishonest approval for such action by
the very people elected to Parliament to help and indeed protect the
Australian population.
It seems that it has been necessary for
Parliaments and others involved, past and present, to work politically,
medically and dentally together with Health Departments, Ministers, N.H. and
M.R.C. and universities to conceal from "The People" of the world the
adverse effects on their health.
A Royal Commission should concurrently
examine and investigate those responsible for such draconian,
unconstitutional and anti-medical law, and above all else, the political
intellectually dishonest behaviour of Australian Parliaments and their
members.
A Royal Commission ...
should be established to examine the scientific evidence against compulsory
artificial fluoridation ...
One simple question - why ignore the
evidence by 13 Nobel Prize scientists who have spoken out openly against
fluoridation?
Copy List
|
