|
Copy List
Risk of Fluoridation Terrorism in Australia Ignored
At the celebrations of Australia's
Bicentennial Year, His Royal Highness, Price Charles of Wales, spoke these
words:
"The true celebration of this nation
is in its Constitution. In those dry-sounding but hard fought for rules
and regulations, every family in this remarkable country has its rights
protected and cherished..." (The Age, January 27, 1988)
For years compulsory medication by
fluoridation of water supplies, prohibited by our Constitution as a
compulsory dental service, and all of the lethal consequences of ingesting a
potent toxin that accompany the measure, has been tolerated and is STILL
BEING TOLERATED by two thirds of the national population and without
intervention by Her Majesty's Constitutional representative.
Section 51 (xxiiiA), by virtue of its
prohibitions rather than for its provisions, is probably the most important
'family right' enshrined in the Constitution. At the same time, it has
proved to be more abused, by violation, than any other claim.
During World War II, an Australian
newspaper used this heading relating to the actions of the Australian Army
against the Japanese invaders.
"We are alive and free today because
of these magnificent Australian Soldiers."
Unless politicians and their political
parties act like responsible adults and honour their moral obligation to the
Australian Constitution, the above quotation and its sacred meaning has no
impact on Australian Governments who lack all moral respect for those who
gave the supreme sacrifice for the present population.
Open Slaver
Fluoridation chemicals are transported by
rail and road throughout the world but after September 11, 2001 the
conditions changed dramatically.
The U.S.A. is attempting to protect safe
deliveries of fluoride to fluoridation plants.
One large transport, Quality Carriers, are
reported in The Wall Street Journal, September 27, 2001 as stating, "there
is no such thing anymore as a routine delivery."
"The New York Police, guarding against
chemical or biological attacks now demand a copy of its driver's license
and registration before allowing him to make his twice-daily delivery of
fluorosilicic acid, a fluoridation agent, to suburban water-treatment
facility that serves the City."
"There is stepped up scrutiny of company
tankers!"
Soon after the World Trade Center
Terrorists attack I wrote to the Australian Prime Minister (8th October,
2001) addressed to Parliament House, Canberra, suggesting he appoints a
senior secretary to contact me on a matter of national importance.
The fluoridation word was not mentioned,
but the serious possibility of terrorists action was suggested, and perhaps
I should be contacted accordingly.
My letter was not acknowledged, nor
answered, no contact was ever made from the Prime Minister's office.
Who is looking after you?
by Glen S.R. Walker
When you are drugged, in your own
home, against your will, 24 hours a day, with no way to escape, you have no
human rights!
Each person is subjected to compulsory
daily drugging with sodium silicofluoride, added to your drinking water by
your Government, through "Acts of Parliament", supposedly made on your
behalf!
The Sodium Silicofluoride, your daily dose,
is an unproven and unregistered chemical for human ingestion
completely and utterly lawless.
The "Law" demands proof of human safety
by strict specified scientific pharmacology, before official registration as
a safe material for human consumption.
That has never happened anywhere in the
world, which, under our medical laws, makes fluoridation illegal, but
politicians turn their backs on FACTS of such illegal actions against the
people they represent.
Who is looking after you!
Copy List
|
