|
Copy List
Democracy or Demockery
By Glen S.R. Walker
Which is the most powerful?
Fluoridation or Law?
Answer: Fluoridation is so powerful, it
controls the thinking (sic) of politicians, scientists and even universities
where Common Law and Constitutions all fall before this powerful commercial
wealth of toxic waste disposal convenience and economy relating to
fertiliser factories producing Superphosphate.
Toxicology: The materials used to
fluoridate community drinking water supplies, are collected as a pollutant
in exhaust chimneys of fertiliser factories. They are sodium silicofluoride
and hydro-fluorosilicic acid, both by-products, exhausted to waste from
superphosphate production.
WHY EXHAUSTED?
(1) This waste fluoride by-product is so
toxic that if left in the final fertiliser produced, superphosphate, it
would KILL cattle, pastures, animals and possibly the farmer.
(2) By International Law, dumping of this
fertiliser pollutant into oceans, rivers, seas and general landfills is
prohibited.
(3) The only LEGAL (?) manner of
disposal is governed by politicians in different places, such as
Australia, where your elected government representatives vote to allow the
fertiliser factories to DUMP the toxic fluoride waste pollutant into your
drinking water supplies.
(4) This action by your parliamentary
representative is quietly processed without your approval, without your
constitutional representation or wish and indeed without medical need.
(5) The rules of fluoridation endorsement,
programmed on the international fluoride basis are, "never give the people
any involvement by referenda: desist fluoridation public debate" and keep
the media "on side", all of which is performed world-wide with their
excellence (partial success) of promoting "the fluoridation myth".
(6) Countries objecting to and indeed
rejecting fluoridation or indeed never considering it for their people,
represent 96% of the world population.
(7) Your Health Department will explain in
a scientific manner (?) that the 96% world population is out of step with
fluoride chemistry and pharmacology, whereas our health departments are
world leaders in those scientific matters.
Put aside all the nonsensical unscientific
propaganda relating to teeth and consider the daily dose of fluoride
medicine you are forced to drink every day of your life, dose unknown!
Consider the Government, plus medical
scientists, universities, dental and medical organisations, pharmacologists
and their School of Pharmacology, all supporting THE HUMAN DAILY DOSE OF
FLUORIDE via your kitchen tap, and indeed being drugged in your own home
24 hours of every day, all without your wish or permission, nor indeed any
health need!
In fluoridation gibberish, it is called
DEMOCRACY.
None of the above, singly or in scientific
unison, can pronounce scientifically, the daily DOSE of fluoride per person,
living in any fluoridated drinking water supply area of the world, including
Australia.
Logic and plain commonsense unmasks the
fluoride government lobby's mythical science of compulsory mass medication
by adding toxic fluoride to a drinking water supply.
Firstly, it should be understood that
doctors cannot get patients' blood analysed for fluoride - there seems some
kind of instruction prohibiting this NATURAL MEDICAL PROCEDURE.
We receive calls from doctors from all over
Australia asking if we will do this necessarv medical procedure for them.
Doctors cannot get patients' blood analysed
for fluoride.
So, without this necessary medical
procedure which is unavailable in Australia, it surely keeps that
unspeakable word "Fluoride" out of doctors' books, and no records of the
cumulating fluoride in human bodies!
We now come to see the serious absurdity of
the "expounded" science bv those scientifically (?) promoting fluoridation!
Pharmacology defines DOSE as a quantity of
medicine (drugs) prescribed to be taken at one time and the drug to be
related to individual medical examination.
Drugs are chemicals that have specific
effects on part or all of the human body. Fluoride in drinking water
supplies, qualifies accordingly as a drug.
Simplistic logic demonstrates there is an
unknown human daily dose of fluoride from fluoridated water, because the
amount of water consumed per person differs enormously under different
circumstances.
The fluoridation DOSE of fluoride is
therefore a serious contradiction of medical pharmacology and human care.
From the foregoing one may or should be
concerned about the great commercial fluoride myth.
However, the medical crunch is so serious
it makes a mockery of medical laws and Government Health responsibility.
The fluoride chemicals, sodium
silicofluoride and fluorosilisic acid you are forced to daily consume by
government mandatory laws (democracy?) are of crude industrial quality and
not of pharmaceutical, purified quality required in human medication.
But there is more!
Fluoride chemicals are not registered or
licensed for human use.
These fluoride chemicals are not
REGISTERED or LICENSED for human use. (This was admitted by the
U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the E.P.A. (responsible for the amount
of fluoride permitted in U.S. drinking water supplies), in the U.S. Senate
2002.
But there is more!
The Australian Constitution under -
Legislative powers of the Parliament Section 51 (xxiiA) state:
"the provision ... pharmaceutical,
sickness and hospital benefits, medical and dental services, but not so as
to authorise any form of civil conscription ..."
Compulsory fluoridation with a drug is
medical and dental conscription.
A rule book can be ignored, bent or
misquoted or indeed hidden, but a Constitution is an insurance policy that
governs without interference, it embodies justice, democracy and law with
complete compliance by all people.
Strange that this compliance is exempted in
fluoridated countries, including of course Australian parliaments,
demonstrating democracy.
Of interest is the listing of Fluorides by
Mercks Manual 1999 - "RAT POISON, ROACH POISONS ..." Your daily dose! (see
following article)
However, your Parliament and the general
run of fluoride travellers will attempt to convince you that this particular
crude industrial fluoride pollutant is harmless stuff, and harmless it must
be because they say so as your representative, knowing what is best
for you to drink, and saving you the energy of thinking for yourself about
your health and human rights. They consider they are the health experts!
Fluoridation promoters replace
scientific facts with opinions, the basis of the fluoridation scientific
machine at work!
Their great wish and indeed instruction to
their followers and sleeping partners, is "Don't spoil a good story
with facts!!!" Their commercial kind of fluoride science is trashed by
leading world scientists and documented in scientific prestigious journals.
If you are not paying reverence to the
Establishment and their groups of do-gooders, you will find yourself out to
sea like the proverbial shag on the rock.
But heed not the politicians and medical
quacks, whose knowledge is vast - it's just TRUTH that it lacks!
There undoubtedly are some who are honest
and true; if ever I find one, I'll send him to you.
Fluoride from aluminium smelter causes
fluorosis.
The following kind of news never reaches
the public through our "free press".
The Indo-Asian News Service, October 13,
2003, reported that fluoride released from a local aluminium smelter caused
severe damage to 3000 farmers' crops, and "burnt" paddy crops in about 12
villages under the Khalari area.
Fluoride has contaminated the ground water
in villages located near the smelter.
Scientists found an
astonishing 67% of men suffered fluorosis.
In a study conducted in the same area in
1990, scientists found an astounding 67 per cent of men suffering fluorosis.
Cattle population has also dropped precipitously in the area because of
bone-weakening disease due to the impact of fluoride.
Law and Constitution
In the Ecologist, September 2003, a
letter by Nick Reeves, Executive Director, Chartered Institution of Water
and Environmental Management, U.K. points to laws and constitutions as
follows:
"Fluoridation not only contravenes the
Human Rights Act, but would appear to violate the Poisons Act, the E.U.
Codified Pharmaceuticals Directive, the Code of Medical Ethics as set out
in the Council of Europe's Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine and
Consumer legislation besides. But the ethical issue is much stronger."
As all those conventions exist and we do
not doubt their correctness, one must ask how those laws are allowed to be
ignored? It does not fit all the democratic rhetoric bursting out of
democratic countries.
Conclusion
Panic exploded throughout the U.K. fluoride
lobby when the Minister for Health is reported writing October 2003 to
M.P.'s that:
"People who drink fluoridated water
can protect their teeth without needing to take any personal action."
(tooth brushing).
She added:
"Fluoridation is also cheaper - water
fluoridation delivers greater reduction in decay than toothpaste ..."
It is reported from the U.K. that
toothpaste manufacturers have cancelled their distribution of Christmas
turkeys to particular politicians, not all, just some!
Copy List
|
