|
Copy List
More fluoride, more dentists
Australian communities
plagued with trendy elites, do-gooders, professional organisations, etc, must
surely be embarrassed, if ever that mental condition occurs under their
armadillo hides, to read the dental report, Herald-Sun, Melbourne, 8 April
2000.
The heading "150,000 on
dental list". This identifies the truth about fluoridation claims,
guaranteed by the Governments, Health Departments, their ministers, A.D.A.
and A.M.A.
"The wonderful effect
of compulsory fluoridation is stopping tooth decay in children and
adults."
The 150,000 is only in
Victoria where their reason for the "over burdened public dental service"
results in "20-22 months waiting lists".
The reason given by Dental
Authorities is they need "more money to employ more dentists".
Remember the early
statements about fluoridating Australia -
"Dentists will become
history".
The President of the
Australian Dental Association of Victoria is reported as stating, "a long
waiting list changed the emphasis of treatment from prevention to pain
control."
Prevention was the
name of the game for fluoridation!
The dental statement
conflicts with the A.D.A. platform of claims about fluoridation,
stating (fluoridation) is the ultimate "treatment for prevention" but
failed to record for public information they also need many, many more
dentists - and great dollops of Government money (our taxes) den to treat
that phantom dental disease that does not exist!
A new Victorian Oral Health
Labour Force Study will be released in April. The study is conducted by
Professor John Spencer, Dental School, Adelaide University.
Professor Spencer is
Chairman of the N.H. & M.R.C. Fluoridation Committee appointed to evaluate
and judge scientifically our submissions to the N.H. & M.R.C. 1999.
Pro-fluoridation authors
always promote fluoridation as the natural means of stopping tooth decay
with an unnatural industrial crude quality chemical.
They are so
organisationally blinded by the fluoride gimmick that scientific evidence
against fluoridation goes unseen, unspoken and unpublished. It must not see
the light of public knowledge.
These journals and
authors seem afraid to include information such as unfluoridated Brisbane
children's teeth being equal to teeth in other compulsorily fluoridated
capital cities of Australia.
How can they say that
fluoridation has been responsible for the improved children's teeth when the
most favourable control city of Brisbane has never been fluoridated and
their children having such excellent teeth.
The "science" of
fluoridation completely collapses when the truth of Brisbane
children's teeth is transparently clear except when purposely hidden by the
dental fraternity in living fear of the fluoridation hoax becoming public.
Copy List
|
