|
Copy List
Corkscrew justice and truth desecrated in
fluoridation "democracy"
Year after year during the past 50 years
the U.S. fluoridation cohorts from Government Departments, A.D.A., A.M.A.,
E.P.A., etc. have been claiming they KNOW fluoridation is safe.
These groups come up with another plan of
inquiry into fluoridation.
That is a well thought up plan, because
whilst an inquiry is in progress they hide themselves and their scientific
nonsense awaiting results that usually could be written by anybody knowing
their forthcoming nonsensical results.
There are three more important (sic)
fluoridation research projects awaiting publication:
(1) The Irish Government promised last
August!
(2) The U.K. Medical Research
(3) The latest of all places United States
Environmental Protection Agency, responsible for the fluoride dose in their
drinking water supplies.
After over 50 years arrogantly claiming
fluoridation safe (because he said, he said and he said for 50 years), the
E.P.A. has just called for submissions on "The Measurements of
Fluorosilicates in Drinking Water".
In their introduction on the Research
Project the E.P.A. state:
The release of fluoride proceeds
through a complex, multi step equilibrium process that is not well
understood." (How true)
"As such, the results of this study
will be of use to state agencies, water utilities and other Government or
scientiric bodies who seek to ensure the quality of the nation's drinking
water supplies."
(Half a century to admit their lack of
scientific knowledge and the meaning of "quality drinking water").
So, after over 50 years assurance to the
U.S. people, now the E.P.A. DOES NOT KNOW what they are on about with
the health of people forced to drink fluoridated water, purposely laced with
toxic industrial crude quality sodijm silicofluoride from the chimneys of
fertiliser factories.
Perhaps we can add a suggestion on behalf
of people under the E.P.A. compulsory fluoridation experiment.
Logic, commonsense and honest pharmacology
and medicine, will demand an "Effective measurement of the crude sodium
silicofluoride pollutant, forced into the body of people during the E.F.A.
on going 50 year experiment on U.S. people."
Australian authorities, A.D.A., A.M.A., N.H.
and M.R.C. and all Health Departments live in the back woods of science,
unable to admit evidence of fluoridation, "not well understood", and
continue to assure the people of Australia that "they know all the answers".
If they do, the U.S., E.P.A. will welcome
their submission, copy please for our file.
The Fluoride Safety Factor of
Fairyland
Australian dentists and the World Fluoride
Lobby keep informing the public that their projected adjustment of fluoride
in drinking water supplies is a "natural process" meaning the fluoride
chemical additives are natural.
The lie to their statement is an old public
report in the Sydney Sun, April 4, 1968, announcing Sydney's water supply
would be fluoridated on that day.
However, although they claimed, "the
greatest day for teeth" by compulsory fluoridation, the paper also included
the following data:
"The acid which yields the fluoride
is made from what used to be an unwanted waste product.
Greenleaf Fertilisers Ltd. makes
superphosphate from phosphate rock shipped into N.S.W. from Nauru and
Florida.
Until recently, the fumes which went
to waste up the chimney while the rock was being converted to fertiliser
were mainly hydrofluosilicic acid in gaseous form.
Now the company traps the gas,
liquifies it and thus furnishes the Water Board with a cheap form of
fluoride."
Not a natural product by any honesty.
This data was well known to the Sydney
Water Board who voted 4 2 against fluoridation in 1963, but the N.S.W.
Government forced fluoridation into Sydney water against the professional
wish of the Water Board.
"The fluoride chemical for Sydney
water was supplied by George Shirley Pty Ltd, the selling agent for
Australian Fertiliser Ltd., and I.C.I.A.N.Z. is a major shareholder in
both companies.
Their new superphosphate plant is a $4
million project with its phosphate rock from Nauru Island."
The I.C.I. fertiliser company, Australian
Fertiliser Ltd., was granted the first 10 year contract from the Hamer
Government for the fluoride chemical to fluoridate Melbourne, commenced
1977.
This A.D.A. so-called natural product
is so toxic that by International Law the containers with sodium
silicofluoride, must be branded HAZARDOUS CARGO, POISON, together with the
international symbol the graphic sign SKULL AND CROSS BONES.
Sodium Silicofluoride must be reduced in
superphosphate because it will poison pastures and kill and cripple grazing
animals, but we humans by Government command must eat it! Democracy!
This mythical fluoride drug has been
promoted for over 50 years and still cannot be proven to the world to be
safe.
It is arrogantly promoted by Australian
politicians, A.M.A., A.D.A. National Health and Medical Research Council,
all supported by the World Health Organisation, W.H.O., none of whom have
ever performed one single original practical clinical research.
Instead of rooms of white coats in these
organisations, it would be a task to find even a bunsen burner or chemical
instrumental hardware, their only chemical processing is the office coffee
machine.
All the above have been asked for
scientifically documented proof of fluoridation safety. Only the W.H.O.
replied with a 20 page dossiere that did not once use the word "safe", but
pages of useless fluoride propaganda.
When the Victorian Fluoridation Act was
debated (sic) in Parliament, one member asked the Minister for Health what
research had been done by the above promoters of fluoridation.
The Minister of Health stated NONE.
So, where does all this great science of
fluoridation come from? It is a profitable commercial figment of the
fluoride international fluoride lobby, that controls what you eat and drink
by compulsory Acts of Parliament the politicians you vote into Parliament.
Almost every Australian report on
fluoridation uses the above Gang of Scientific Experts, as endorsement of
their crude scientific statements about fluoridation.
By law (sic) all chemicals, drugs,
medicines used on humans, including fluoridation, are required to be passed
by pharmaceutical testing and approval, from responsible institutions such
as the world respected Food and Drug Agency (F.D.A.).
After over 50 years of the unscientific
basis of fluorides and fluoridation, the F.D.A. admit they have never
received an application for registration of these chemicals used for dental
treatment.
The same applies with the U.S., E.PA., who
control the maximum amount of fluoride permitted to be used in the U.S.A.
They admitted this year they have no
scientific evidence presented to them on this matter BUT they still force
fluoridation on the U.S. people at up to 4 p.p.m. F.
Democracy in gutter politics, on the
wealthy fluoride roundabout, that alters accordingly "if being found out",
but democratic accountability not a factor in human health.
Consider Australian nursing mothers, never
publicly, press, radio, TV, Health Departments or N.H. and M.R.C. warning
about the danger of making up baby formula food with fluoridated water,
resulting in a fluoride toxic dose to their babies. Serious? Yes, very
serious, but no research accordingly!
What is it about fluoride that makes public
health quite secondary to using the poisonous waste fluoride pollutant from
fertiliser factories?
There must be a reason unrelated to
democratic Governments and the politicians elected to represent the people
forced into this unrealistic, undemocratic, unscientific and uncontrollable
daily druggery with a fluoride chemical waste by product of fertiliser
factories called a natural product by dentists.
How undemocratic is fluoridation?
Our letters to Government, politicians,
ministers, Health Departments and the A.D.A. are not answered.
If fluoridation is safe and effective,
there will be no delay in answering correspondence on the matter,
irrespective of the question, everyone the world over will clamour for this
great safe way of stopping tooth decay.
BUT, the world is not interested in the
invented fluoride tooth fairy.
Look at Europe no fluoridation.
RACKETS GALORE
The power, the truth and the scandal of
fluoridating drinking water.
Australians have been subjected to the
fluoridation propaganda, just add fluoride to drinking water and
"abracadabra!" no more tooth decay, and no more dentists.
The fluoridation system is claimed to
especially protect the teeth of under priviliged children.
What really has happened?
The Sunday Times, April 2002
published an article on Western Australian children's teeth. (West Australia
commenced fluoridation in 1968.)
The heading "Serious tooth decay at five"
"Preschoolers in WA. are having to
undergo major dental work, including emergency extractions, because their
teeth have decayed beyond repair."
"The Australian Dental Association oral
health education committee Chairman, Don Wilson, said many parents had been
lulled into a false sense of security about the protection of fluoridated
water."
Question who formulated that "sense of
security" with fluoridation? The very same people.
The Herald Sun 7th June, 2002
published the following data -
"BAD TEETH
Aussie mouths house more than 19
million untreated teeth according to the Australian Institute of Health
and Welfare. In 1996 alone, almost 11 million teeth freshly
decayed". (Emphasis added)
That short, indeed very short official
declaration on teeth by that Institute, failed public responsibility by NOT
questioning Australian Governments, i.e. politicians, A.D.A., A.M.A., N. H.
and M.R.C., Health Ministers, and even Universities, on their "expert"
scientific promise that after introducing fluoridation dental decay will
cease and no more fillings or extractions from the cradle to the grave.
Are dentists filling the unemployed
agencies?
Perhaps the answer to the question, why
such a small press report, is, that the A.D.A. include the Institute of
Health and Welfare as one recommending fluoridation in the A.D.A.
dossier sent to Victorian politicians.
The A.D.A. also include The Brotherhood of
St. Lawrence, a wonderful community organisation, but nothing in the
scientific field of fluoridation research.
Another name supplied as a fluoridation
scientific entity, Victorian Water Industry Association, draws attention to
the scientific standards encircling the A.D.A. and their science of
fluoridation. The A.D.A. dossier to the Victorian Politicians made this
statement:
"Water fluoridation provides the
greatest benefit to those who can least afford dental care, because it has
been found to reduce socio economic inequalities in caries experience."
Seems the news has not reached Western
Australia or Tasmania where the President of the A.D.A. last year stated,
"There is a dental crisis in Tasmania", even though Tasmania has been
fluoridated throughout that State starting 1953.
Is fluoride safe in water, toothpaste and
baby formula reconstituted food? NO.
It was not long ago that every day and
night on all TV channels we were bombarded with Colgates and Mrs Marsh
selling fluoridated toothpaste.
The program was supported by all the
fluoride cohorts including Health Departments, politicians and A.D.A.
Children were shown the "correct" way to
clean their teeth use a brush full about 2 inches (50mm) but no worry if
more was placed on the brush, or in the mouth.
The Australian Fluoridation News published
articles on the danger of such ingestion of fluoride toothpaste by children.
The A.D.A. dossier to Politicians contains
this warning about fluoride toothpaste, this is the organisation quite happy
to support the Colgate advertisement and indeed advised their patients, and
still do, to use only fluoride toothpaste.
Statement
"To reduce the risk of dental
fluorosis, parents should suerpvise tooth brushing for children under the
age of six, apply only a smear to toothpaste and discourage the
child from swallowing or eating it. They should use a low fluoride
children's toothpaste." (Emphasis added)
Who's looking after your children?
Is fluoride toothpaste safe?
(Australian Fluoridation News Nov/Dec 1995)
Who is responsible for reducing that
so-called benign fluoride chemical by 99%, entering children's mouths? And
its subsequent journey through the child's body?
Has there been even a suggestion of
accountability for the action of the manufacturer and the Government,
together with other medical agencies about public advertisements that
mislead the public and needed a health correction of 99% dose of fluoride?
Would this be hidden under the Government
Health Department carpets and if the same occurred with a drug company and
its claims in advertising, would the Government remain silent? Was there
really a reduction of Dentists, when our drinking waters were fluoridated?
We have already in past issues documented
data on this matter, but perhaps part of the fluoridation scandal is clearly
illustrated by commencement of new larger dental hospitals in Melbourne,
Adelaide, and Perth.
As we go to press, Wimbledon Tennis is
about to commence, but you will find more rackets in fluoridation than at
Wimbledon.
Do you care?
by G.S.R. Walker
Copy List
|
