|
Copy List
Fluoridation, the Science of Nothingness
Fluoridation is a medicine by Government
proclamation;-
"Therapeutic Goods Administration" National
Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee August 2002.
"Medicine means:
Therapeutic goods that are represented to
achieve, or are likely to achieve, their principle action by
pharmacological, chemical, immunological or metabolic means in or on the
body of human or animal." (Therapeutic Goods Act 1989.)
This medicine is part of Baby Formula Foods,
made up with fluoridated tap water, but without pharmaceutical dose per baby
or Government public notices to parents of young children about its poison
danger to babies.
With daily media pronouncements about medical
wonders, there is a medical failing (sponsored by the Governments), in any
attempt to rectify or acknowledge the outrageous elementary medical
deficiency in medicating a population with an unknown fluoride
medical DOSE, controlled by individual THIRST and introduced especially for
children up to 12 years of age.
It must surely be the medical blunder of the
world - a medicine with the dose humanly dictated by individual thirst.
Fluoridation is science and tumbleweed rolling
down the scientific pathway in silence, covered in dust and going nowhere
(except the bank).
Consider the report - The Child Dental
Health Survey, Australia 1999 by the Australian Institute of Health and
Welfare. Published in all Australian media.
Firstly the Report states Australian children
have the "best teeth in the world".
However, the Report also stated - between
1996-1999 there was a 22%, increase in caries of 5 year olds.
The survey of 372,000 children also found
decayed, missing and filled teeth were increasing in the 4-15 year olds.
Of course, there were "estimated" reasons and
recorded worn-out old testimony of comparisons between areas in Australia,
but seemed unaware of "putting their foot in troubled waters".
The report shows Victoria was amongst the
worst "in the country", just behind Queensland and Tasmania.
A reasonable survey should qualify real
possible reasons and distinction.
"Tasmania amongst the worst"
Tasmania, the great qualifier of distinction!
The longest fluoridated area in Australia, proudly boasting their
fluoridation position of "historical first fluoridated State in Australia,
1953". That is 50 years of fluoridation and the latest official survey
places Tasmania "amongst the worst in Australian caries experience".
The medical blunder of the world - a
medicine with the dose humanly dictated by individual thirst.
The Report does little justice in using and
noting the position of Queensland which under laws of statistics one must
recognise the existing difference especially in the socio-economic
situation, including size of State, population and indigenous children, a
far cry from Tasmania, when the Report shows Queensland children's teeth
only 0.15 difference in decay and to note Queensland has a small percentage
of their State fluoridated estimated at 5%.
Perhaps the Australian Dental Association
Committee Chairman in Perth W.A. made the exact description of fluoridation
as quoted in the West Australian:
"Don Wilson, Chairman, said many parents
had been lulled into a false sense of security about the protection of
fluoridation water."
The Report's co-author, Jason Armfield, stated
possible causes of increasing tooth decay were too much tank and bottled
water avoiding water with fluoride.
Suggestion - go back and examine children's
teeth world wide, such as the whole of Europe, that is free of fluoridation
and discover fluoridation is a fraud.
Take the right dose
The Melbourne Herald-Sun, "Health Watch", 6th
March, 2003 published an article, "Play Safe with Pills":
"The Pharmaceutical Society of Australia's
Victorian president, Valda Camber, said using medications safely was about
using and following directions on the label. She said that as each person
was different, the effects of a drug could also vary.
When you use someone else's medication,
there is a chance that you could react to it. just because it works for you
doesn't mean it will work for someone else."
As each person was different, the effects
of a drug could also vary.
Valda Comber,
Victorian President, The Pharmaceutical Society of Victoria, 6th March 2003.
In special "Right Dose" the article
highlights:
"Make sure that children know medications
are only to be taken when sick and can be dangerous if misused."
But fluoridation is an all day, every day
medicine, served into your home with an uncontrolled daily DOSE for
everyone, young and old, sick or healthy, with teeth or without. The Health
Department, hospitals and pharmacy clinics do not medically examine people
for fluoride in blood, bones or tissue!
It seems an unwritten law not to examine
humans for fluoride - we get calls from doctors asking if we can do it for
them!!!
We enjoyed correspondence from a man who's
patience was wearing thin after many letters to his Minister for Health.
The classical reply is worth quoting:
"Due to backlog of correspondence it may be
sometime before replying to your letter."
Interpretation: "That will be never".
Official statements and facts
Truth and Fact does not exist in some
Governments.
Remember all the official U.S. Department of
Defence statements answering questions on the effects on Gulf War I, health
of Veterans. They stated very few U.S. soldiers were injured or killed in
the Gulf War I, and their latest study showing no verifiable physical cause
for what has been called Gulf War Syndrome.
The Fact - now 209,000 soldiers have filed
disability claims, and the Department of Defence has approved without
comment, 161,000 of those claims.
These official cover-up data reminds us of the
great official research into the efficiency of fluoride toothpaste. (Swed.
Dent. J. 1982) The study showed that 250 ppm fluoride toothpaste as
effective as 1000 ppm but either one was very effective.
Well, the scientific fluoride crunch was
illustrated in the same article (p. 237):
"For ethical reasons, it was not possible
to include a true control, i.e., children who were using a dentifrice
without fluoride in the study."
So, anything without fluoride is of no
interest or benefit to dental science. Ethical reasons, afraid they may find
non-fluoridated toothpaste better in all cases?
Proof that the American Dental Association
has known about the dangers of fluoride since 1936. Today's science tells
the same story - but with additional adverse health effects.
Ingestion of fluoride today is far greater
than it was in 1936.
"Fluorine is a general protoplasmic poison,
but the most important symptoms of chronic fluorine poisoning known at
present, are mottling of teeth and interference with bone formation. It is
virtually impossible to avoid a small fluorine intake, just as it is
virtually impossible to avoid a small lead intake, but when the threshold
value is exceeded, as it is in drinking water containing one or more parts
of fluorine per 1,000,000, detectable signs of toxicity appear." Journal
of the American Dental Association, Vol. XXIII, p574, 1936.
NOTE: "Such facts and
scientific knowledge and proofs cannot be eliminated from the world by a
fluoride lobby of dentists and public health officials who ignore these
facts and knowledge time after time." Rudolf Ziegelbecker, Graz, Austria.
The Australian Dental Association published
the following for "handouts" in dentist's rooms. 2003.
"The promotional message run in Victorian
newspapers during 1977 was "Water Fluoridation is effective, safe and
inexpensive." "The message hasn't changed."
Great propaganda, but all without scientific
proof of effectiveness and safety.
That is the game of fluoridation, a game not a
science.
Copy List
|
