|
Copy List
The Genuine
Fluoridation Chemical Equation
Our Heritage at Grave
Risk!
By Glen S.R.
Walker F.I.M.F., E.M.E.C.S.,
Chemistry is based
on just a few important principles, none of which
are recognised by those promoting fluoridation and
those who support all kinds of prescription drugs.
This support is without knowing the chemical base
formula of the drugs or medicines to be consumed by
humans in enormously different health situations.
Consider one main
medical principle governed by Pharmaceutical Law,
“The Dose”, with instructions given.
A Dose, which is
recommended by a Drug Manufacturer, is supposedly,
by law (as a protection to the user), carefully and
professionally investigated by the Regulatory Agency
of Australia, TGA, before permission for public use
and distribution and indeed advertising making
claims accordingly.,
All these
“controlled” (?) drugs, medicines, are monitored for
serious side effects resulting in numbers being
withdrawn from the market because of finding danger
to the health of the user even though prescribed by
professional “experts”.
Sometimes drugs are
subjected to claimed intense research after which
they are presented to Regulatory Agencies for
further investigation, all before permission for
human use.
Investigating
published data on drugs one often finds
contra-indications of safety, giving adverse data,
and even Interaction warnings, but most often these
warnings are relative to other drug usage and other
possible health problems (diseases).
Fluoridation
Warnings
None of the above
research, which provides medical protection to drug
manufacturers and prescribers, attempts to
scientifically analyse dangerous side effects of
fluoridation with its non-licenced or registered
fluoride chemicals for human use.
The First
Warning
Fluoride pollutant
waste products used in water fluoridation, are crude
quality chemicals for human prescription, in
contrast to prescription drugs which are proclaimed
by Authorities as refined pure grade chemicals of
pharmaceutical quality.
The Second
Warning
Fluoridation
conflicts with every pharmaceutical law of medicine,
where the important use of a drug/medicine is
scientifically and supposedly governed by a
scientific establishment of “The Dose”.
For the past 60
years of compulsory artificial fluoridation there
has never been a scientific, medical, pharmaceutical
official declaration of the fluoride dose of each
and every person forced to ingest these fluoride
waste toxic chemicals delivered through your kitchen
tap by courtesy of your Parliament and its members,
all without obeying pharmaceutical laws concerning
every prescribed drug as required by Law for all
such drugs.
The Third
Warning
Relates to the
simple principle of chemicals and drugs in which
control depends upon:
(a) purity of
chemical,
(b) pH (acid-alkoli),
(c) temperature
under which it is used, (exposed),
(d) time factor
together with the all-important action-reaction
and interaction to everything it becomes involved
with directly or indirectly.
The Fourth
Warning
The resulting
chemical product produced by either action or
reaction and interaction with the fluoridated water
chemicals and its unknown chemical composition of
many chemicals, results in the final product not
being scientifically known, because the chemical
equation is so complex and safety not proven.
Stranger than
fiction is the story of fluoride chemicals.
Consider the water
pumped into your home!
In fluoridated
areas it contains Sodium Silicofluoride or
Hydrofluorosilicic Acid, both crude, unrefined
chemicals from exhaust chimneys of fertiliser
factories.
These fluoride
chemicals contain toxic impurities making it a
complex mixture of toxic substances.
Stranger than
fiction is the story of fluoride chemicals.
One would think the
reality of chemicals (and pharmaceutical
commonsense), would prevail, either by choice or
law. For reasons of questionable involvement by
those in privileged and responsible positions of
trust, the truth is a serious case of abandonment of
public health for commercial gain.
Scientific
Ignorance of Governments and their Politicians
The scientific
fluoride fiction is alarmingly illustrated by the
dangerous, illogical and scientific ignorance of
Governments and their politicians, their actions
beyond honest comprehension.
Consider the laws
associated with the manufacturing of Superphosphate,
made from phosphate rock.
By Law the
fertiliser factory is prohibited from exhausting the
collected fluoride toxic by-product into the
atmosphere, because of its potent lethal toxicity.
It kills!
Our Government
considers the pumping into the atmosphere of toxic
fluorides from fertiliser factories is a felony and
supposedly is checked accordingly by the E.P.A.
Then follows the
Government’s fictitious health science!
The prohibited
exhaust to atmosphere is solved by inserting into
the fluoride exhaust chimneys “pollution scrubbers”
to collect that particular prohibited toxic
fluoride, and knowingly use it for compulsory mass
medication by fluoridation of public drinking water
supplies pumped into every home.
The reality of
thinking by Government Agencies is a statement in
1983 on the official policy of the USA EPA.
“In regard to the
use of fluorosilicic acid as a source of fluoride
for fluoridation this Agency regards such use as an
ideal environmental solution to a long-standing
problem.
By recovering
by-product fluorosilicic acid from fertiliser
manufacturing, water and air pollution are
minimised, and water utilities have low-cost source
of fluoride available to the communities.” (Rebecca
Hammer, Deputy Administrator, Office of Water, US
EPA 1983.)
The EPA did not
advise that this by-product from fertiliser
factories is in fact a waste by-product containing
impurities such as silicates, arsenic, uranium ,
radium, lead, cadmium, radionuclides and chromium.
This makes up the chemical shandy together with
other water additives such as lime to change the
acidity, alum, aluminium sulphate, chlorine and
ammonia.
Melbourne public
water supply is polluted with Fluoride 1030 tonnes
per annum, Lime 2070 tonnes, Aluminium Sulphate 1750
tonnes, Chlorine 550 tonnes, Sodium Hydrochloride
250 tonnes, and Ammonia 8 kilolitres. (Data by
Minister of Environment and Conservation, October
2000.)
William Hirzy put
the looney position in clear commonsense facts:
“If this stuff gets
out into the atmosphere, it’s a pollutant, if it
gets into the river, it’s pollution, if it gets into
a lake, it’s pollution, but if it goes straight into
your drinking water system, it’s not a pollutant -
that’s amazing!”
Fluoride Intake
by Infants
The great “Cover
Up” continues. Some years ago I purchased every Baby
Formula Food sold in Victoria all paid for by
myself. We never receive any help from the
Government; even tax concessions or donations were
rejected, but we have a different attitude to
helping our fellow man.
The following is
NOT secondhand. I made assays of all the Baby
Formula Foods using their mixing instructions,
except I made two determinations, one reconstituted
with fluoridated tap water, and another with
fluoride free water.
The fluoridated tap
water “Formula Food” contained 2-3 ppm Fluoride, the
unfluoridated water reconstituted between 0.7 - 1.0
ppm Fluoride.
The conclusion was
obvious. Babies were being poisoned when fed Baby
Formula Food reconstituted with fluoridated water.
Commonsense shows the Government permitted dose for
adults is water containing 1 ppm F and babies were
being fed 2-3 ppm F, a matter of 200% - 300%
overdose. Even the fluoride concentration in baby
formula food mixed with fluoride free water is a
cause for concern at 1ppm.
Most countries
consider infants should not be fed any fluoride.
Nature, in mothers
breast milk, wisely removes all fluoride.
The conclusion was
obvious. Babies were being poisoned when fed Baby
Formula Food reconstituted with fluoridated water.
No matter how we
tried to warn mothers of such small babies being
overdosed with fluoride, the matter was ignored for
years until the N.H. and M.R.C. “courageously” took
up the message in 1991 confirming my data and
stating:
“These findings,
and the evidence that the duration of infant
formula usage is a risk factor for dental
fluorosis, suggests a need to limit infants
ingestion of fluoride.” (The Effectiveness of
Water Fluoridation, N.H. & M.R.C. 1991.)
The official matter
stopped there and no public notices were published
warning mothers not to reconstitute baby formula
with fluoridated tap water. Of course, it would have
looked rather poor for compulsory mass medicating
the community with such toxic stuff.
The honest fluoride
factor is without Government contribution, indeed it
is by policy hidden from the public.
The serious but
laughable medical fluoridation science revolves
around the ridiculous claim that the human daily
dose of fluoride from fluoridation is centralised by
having 1 ppm F in the water used by the community,
babies to the elderly - healthy to the unhealthy -
daily occupation - sports involvement, all put
together, results in enormous differences of human
water consumption.
So the fluoridation
medical, dental political gurus cannot answer their
prize misinformation.
There is no known
community daily dose simply because of the
enormously different use of drinking water.
Some of this has
been published in daily newspapers, TV and Radio,
but the “experts” keep mouthing the old worn out
silly claim that the dose is 1 ppm F in a water
supply.
A Scientific
Check of Fluoride Dose
The time had
arrived when I again decided to check this Fluoride
Dose Factor that is controlled by just adding 1 ppm
F to the drinking water supply.
The start of this
next research was to check exactly how much fluoride
was in the water delivered to homes in Melbourne.
My first surprise
was to find a different amount of fluoride from some
taps in my own home.
The next step was
samples from each house in the street, only to find
they all differed from 0.2 - 2.0 ppm and on further
tests the different taps gave different readings.
The conclusion was
that fluoride builds up in dead water caused by the
seldom use of particular taps
These analytical
chemical results became public to a situation where
people were complaining about their water supply.
On examination or
fear the water authorities began flushing out all
dead end water mains where fluoride increases
considerably.
Analysing water
samples for fluoride is an expensive matter,
considering cost of scientific equipment and
chemical reagents, all of which originate in the
USA, but necessary for accurate determination as per
world wide standards for such analysis.
Samples of water
were literally flooding in for determination and
occasionally a new direction of fluoridation health
problems would occur.
The conclusion was
that fluoride builds up in dead water caused by the
seldom use of particular taps.
Over many years I
have analysed water samples from rivers, lakes,
reservoirs and oceans all over Australia, together
with hot water urns, tanks, rain and snow, plus
hundreds of household tap water, bore water, milk
and fluoride filters.
The product of
these thousands of fluoride tests confirm the
conflicting data especially with fluoridated water
supplies and the supposed “control of 1 ppm F in tap
water” that does not exist.
At this point of
time I could see the fluoridation problem was
becoming impossible because the Government, A.D.A.,
A.M.A. and Health Departments were all protecting
and arguing against our findings.
Extreme Fluoride
Concentration in Water Urn
In the middle of
one of these debates a friend asked my opinion
regarding sickness of workers in a smelter. The
office workers had more health problems and days off
work than the smelter workers exposed to fumes in
the smelter.
On investigating
the situation I noticed the office canteen had a
large hot water urn that was boiling away at a great
rate. I asked for a sample - I usually carry small
sample containers.
Returning home I
checked that factory urn water and immediately
discovered the reason for staff sickness.
The water contained
15 ppm fluoride which had built up because the urn
was never emptied or cleaned inside. The constant
boiling and evaporation over a relatively long
period kept increasing the fluoride concentration.
This was reported
to the management which commenced a daily emptying
of water from the urn. This also became compulsory
in some establishments where hot water urns were in
constant use.
No, we never
received even a “thank you” because it must not be
made public that we are drinking this utterly toxic
industrial rubbish.
Whilst all the
above is covered up by what we called during the war
- The Fifth Column, my personal experiences with
these groups are indelibly etched in my mind!
Accumulation of
Fluoride in the Human Body - Compounded by Impaired
Kidney Function.
The fact is
unanimous, that half (50%) of fluoride ingested
remains in the body of humans, but that claim is
based on 100% healthy people, a rather rare
condition today.
This is a relative
condition of a person’s kidney function.
In the longest
Court Case on Fluoridation 1980 in the High Court
Edinburgh, there was evidence from top world Kidney
Specialists and the Opinion expressing evidence by
the Judge, Lord Jauncey is as follows:
“However, when
renal function is impaired, there will come a time
when the kidneys will no longer excrete the amount
of fluoride which is being ingested with the results
that the plasma fluoride level rises and excess
fluoride is deposited in the bone.
This situation
arises when renal function is reduced to 20% and
retention of fluoride increases progressively as
renal function further decreases.
“Renal failure per
se can cause certain bone diseases which are
generally described as renal osteodystrophy. It is
probable that such bone diseases start when renal
function is reduced to one third, a level at which
an imbalance of fluoride intake and output will not
have occurred.” (Dr. Victor Parsons.)
This is the
scientific - medical evidence by world kidney
scientists that is either not understood by ignorant
fluoride pushers or ignored in the name and wealth
of fluoridation, pardon, not meaning “the wealth of
human health”.
The U.S.
National Research Council wrote:
“Recommendations
-
Analysis of
fluoride in bone samples from patients and
controls would be valuable in inferring total
lifetime exposure to fluoride. Among the disease
outcomes that warrant study are osteosarcomas and
cancers of the buccal cavity, kidney, bones and
joints.” (Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride.)
Scotland
The Scottish
Executive decided April 2005 not to pursue the
long-standing campaign for fluoridation.
The Scottish people
are proud to be the only English speaking population
that is totally free of fluoridation. (Scottish Pure
Water Association, For the prevention of water
pollution.)
A grand example of
intelligent people!
Copy List
|
