|
Copy List
Letter from a reader:
“A relative from
Germany recently arrived in Melbourne saying he was supplied with data
about health in Victoria.
His attention was drawn
to Health Regulations relative to children’s teeth. He was informed that
children in fluoridated areas had 60% better teeth than those in
non-fluoridated cities.
He was preparing to move
to Bendigo which is not fluoridated. He visited a Doctor of Medicine for
advice, he explained his position - living in a non-fluoridated city and
asked - How much fluoride should he give his child to get the same dose as
his Melbourne cousins and how much fluoride does he get in Melbourne each
day.
The Doctor did not know
the daily fluoride dose of Melbourne children and could not say how much
fluoride he should give his child to be the same as his cousin in
Melbourne.
The doctor suggested he
see a dentist.
My relative seems
mystified because in Germany only Medical Doctors are educated in
pharmacology to deal in drugs. Dentists are permitted to treat the mouths
of people and that is where their educated specialisation stops.
The relative asked
another Australian for advice, he suggested my relative read - “They’re a
Weird Mob” by Nino Culotto.
Dental and Medical
science in Australia!”
THE TALE OF THE CENTURY
Fluoridation, strong in
politics, weak in science, strong in long words with short substance.
Perhaps Nobel Laureate,
Peter Medawar (Nature 2000) presents a balanced view on public awareness and
human rights relating to freedom of choice versus dictatorial so-called
science dominating the human race.
“We should not
underestimate the public’s interest in science, nor its ability to
comprehend complex issues. Fascination with the physical and natural world
is not the exclusive domain of professional scientists, nor is it
dependent on a higher degree of scientific training.
“Scientists tend to claim
that logic, analysis and rigorous experimentation are the major bases of
research and discovery, when in reality they also rely on intuition,
imagination and inventiveness.”
Medawar’s most important
point is one of the hardest to address, the growing divide between sciences
and humanities, and between curiosity-driven and applied research.
Comparing the dental
intelligentsia with their lexicon commercially contrived phrases of
chemistry, medicine and pharmacology, we find their Small Brains Tribunal
spending their energy inventing new words, new chemistry, changing poisonous
fluoride pollutants into class nutrients, fluoride garbage waste into gold,
and a new generation of alchemists practicing and preaching ancient alchemy,
all for an obvious cause! Money!
Their well oiled sorcery
campaign must continue, the fluoride lobby cannot get off the tiger’s back,
dependents are far and wide, reputations and pseudo science must be
protected.
Even the U.S. National
Center for Fluoride Policy Research, 28th June, 2000, entered the sorcery
fluoride campaign by wishing to change the meaning of chimney scrubbers in
fertiliser factories that collect some of the fluoride pollutant and
renaming the scrubbers, PRODUCT RECOVERY UNITS.
George Glasser described it
as attempting to sanitise the name of toxic pollution soup.
All E.P.A. organisations in
the world have stringent regulations regarding toxic emissions from
phosphate fertiliser manufacturing chimneys, in particular the chemical
scrubbers collecting the toxic fluoride emissions, a term that embarrasses
the people attempting to sanitise the correct terminology relating to
poisonous fluoride pollution.
A new chemical language
called “dollar language”.
The purveyors of fluoride
toxic daily diets are scientific frauds because never have they been able to
qualify their flummoxed science that they promote, teach, and possibly reap.
They cannot scientifically quantify benefits from fluoridation, but we can
quantify the large increase in dentists since fluoridation, and their large
incomes (A.B.S.)
Fluoridation has become a world-wide commercial culture
(cult), based on rivers of gold, budgets and money, and no time to deal in
facts.
The fluoride lobby’s fingerprints are all over documents
on fluoridation, irrespective of their covert origin.
The passion exhibited by those following the fluoride
lobby has no real base compared with those against compulsory fluoridation
who spend - devote - their own time and money - quite a difference in
honestly based passion.
Copy List
|
