|
Copy List
THE FLUORIDE
SPIN DOCTORS
By Glen S.R.
Walker
The foundation of
artificial fluoridation science has been a grand
opportunity for Spin Doctors to earn their keep by
their web of cunning messages to the not very
intelligent professionals and politicians alike.
How these people
love and believe the grand tales of the fluoridation
Spin Doctors and the dental fairy tales, which they
promote thinking it leads them into the holy realm
of scientists.
Are Spin Doctors
paid for their repeated authored fairy tales because
there seems no other scientific productivity
evidence.
Confidence in
fluoridation professionals these days demands
blindfolds and ear plugs. One must join the family
of the three wise monkeys that do not see, hear or
speak questioning the medical science of mass
medicating populations with unregistered and
unlicensed fluoride pollutants collected in exhaust
chimneys of fertiliser factories.
None of these
fluoride chemicals have been passed as safe for
humans in fluoridated water by the Australian
Official Regulatory Agencies such as the N.H.M.R.C.
and the Therapeutic Goods Administration.
That Government
Administration will soon be disbanded and replaced
by a new organisation in partnership with New
Zealand, so a powerful history on fluoridation
chemicals will vanish - a rather convenient move?
The dental
ubiquitous statement by these Spin Doctors must
surely be their claim in dental literature that,
"Nature thought of it (fluoridation) first."
If only doctors and
dentists had been educated in a more general sense
of "the actual", many of our health problems would
never have been "invented" or manufactured, such as
fluoridation. When dentists and their
co-fluoridation promoters base their scientific
understanding on such claims that "Nature thought of
fluoridation first", it makes one wonder about their
scientific arrogance in claiming this medical
fluoridation principle was formulated by Nature.
The difference
between dental Spin Doctors rhetoric and Reality of
Nature is a difference between black and white with
absolutely no grey tonings
in the equation.
What is the
actual TRUTH about Nature and fluoride
NATURE provided the
greatest known medical human safety net against
fluoride entering into breast milk fed to babies
(the natural way of feeding a child)!
NATURE, spelt with
a capital N, protects babies from fluoride
poisoning.
No dentist, doctor
or Health Department can deny the medical/Nature
fact that no matter how much fluoride water a
nursing mother consumes or fluoride from other
sources, that fluoride does not transfer into breast
milk, making a Nature formed safety net for babies.
The British Medical
Journal 19th September, 1981 published an article,
"No evidence of transfer of fluoride from plasma to
breast milk".
They quoted:
"Recovery
experiments showed no evidence that fluoride binds
to the constituents of breast milk.
Hence the figures
given for breast milk represent exclusively free
fluoride.
These findings
show that plasma fluoride is poorly transferred to
breast milk and infants thus receive almost no
fluoride during breast feeding."
(All arranged by
Nature!)
Fluoridation
History will, if ever printed for public scrutiny
show appalling data from dental experts.
The Womanıs Day,
4th April, 1960 published an article, "The Case of
Fluoride". Professor Noel Martin, Associate
Professor of Preventive Dentistry, Sydney University
is quoted as follows:
"It can work
wonders stopping tooth decay."
The Sydney Morning
Herald 2005 contradicts that claim, showing the
appalling state of dental decay in Sydney after 40
years of fluoridation.
Professor Noel
Martin is quoted as saying:
"Babies from the
time they're in their mother's womb until they're
grown to children of 12 at least, benefit from it
both ways. Adults' teeth are improved only from
having the fluoride liquid in their mouths, they
can swallow it, of course, but it wonıt do any
special good or cause harm."
He is quoted
saying:
"The Magic White
chemical that is closely related to salt, but
which can work wonders in stopping tooth decay
especially in children."
An article 1985,
"Breastfeeding Matters, a Review on the effects of
milk on dental caries", Australian Journal of Dairy
Technology, Dec. 1979, 179, quotes data from
Professor E. Storey, Dean, Dental School, Melbourne
University (often called the father of fluoridation
in Victoria). He stated:
"Since the 1978
study, other studies have shown that the breast
feeding baby seems to be actively protected from
fluoride; despite deliberately increasing the
amounts in maternal diet, only a tiny amount was
present in breast milk."
"This might
suggest that in evolutionary terms babies are not
intended to get fluoride supplements until they
are on a mixed diet or it may be one of mother
nature's quirks that have no beneficial effect."
"Other things
have changed since 1978. Fluoride was once
considered an essential element for humans."
"In 1976 this was
modified to essential or probably essential"; then
in 1979 the U.S. F.D.A. deleted even that
definition."
"So the belief
that fluoride is essential has been altered, yet
that belief underlies many assumptions about the
safety of dosing children with a known toxin."
"As for infant
tolerance levels, how do we know what they are?"
In spite of all the
fluoridation rhetoric pumped into the medical and
dental world by Spin Doctors preaching the Gospel
according to their presentation, all of which is
unfounded medical science.
This is free
information to dentists and doctors, we do not
charge nor are we paid to educate professional
fluoridation "experts".
Nature and
Fluoride
Did Nature arrange
for fluoride to be ³naturally² in all water, making
it a "natural necessary nutrient", safe and
necessary for human life?
The Creator,
Nature, could not have thought so!
A leading Melbourne
"Natural" Scientist recently stated:
"I get to know
God best through Nature."
From the beginning
of human life, "Nature" designed the female body by
arranging a physiological barrier which prevents the
passage of fluoride from mothersı blood into her
breast milk, thus protecting the baby from fluoride
poisoning and all by Nature.
The Fluoride Spin
Doctors print and extol their scientific
understanding of chemistry and Nature by claiming
most drinking water supplies have a natural
fluoride content.
Once again we must
go to the source or beginning of these claimed
naturally fluoridated waters.
Seems they all
believe and want you to believe that rain and snow
are fluoridated but not explaining how the fluoride
chemicals are introduced before the rain - water -
arrives on Earth!
The Australian
Dental Journal 1966:41 published an article
"Fluoride content of infant formulae in Australia"
by Silvia and Reynolds, School of Dental Science,
University of Melbourne, in which they stated:
"In Australia
dental fluorosis has increased. A recent Western
Australian Study, 48.4 percent of 7-8 year old
children examined exhibited fluorosis of their
maxillary permanent central incisors.
This represented
a 100 percent increase in a similar study three
years earlier."
The fact is that
original water is free of fluoride but some water
collects fluoride as a pollutant from rocks and soil
as it flows on Earth because water is a good solvent
(having power to dissolve) and forms a changed type
of water - a polluted solution.
With the fluoride
collected as a pollutant it changes clean water into
a totally different chemical complex of impurities.
Many years ago
children were given Nature Studies in schools, seems
these simple studies should be part of professional
education today.
The dental fluoride
pushers place much of their "spin" by using the
World Health Organization (WHO) as a scientific
pillar of authority.
Perhaps from the
following criteria by the W.H.O. one can glean some
democratic science, lots of common sense, and in
fact part of the Australian "sleeping" Law.
Ethical Criteria by
W.H.O.
"The issue in all
societies is:
What is proper
behaviour, Ethical criteria for drug promotion
(fluoridation) should lay a foundation for proper
behaviour concerning the promotion of medicinal
drugs consistent with the search for TRUTHFULNESS
and RIGHTEOUSNESS." (emphasis added)
(Ethical Criteria
for medicinal drug promotion World Health
Organization 1988)."
Fluoridation is a
drug (F.D.A.)
The Criteria
concludes with a statement that should be inscribed
on the walls of Parliament and Courts of Law:
"The criteria
should thus assist in "judging" if promotional
practices related to medicinal drugs are in
keeping with acceptable ethical standards."
Does compulsory
artificial fluoridation meet these standards of Drug
Behaviour?
You be the judge.
Are these Ethical Standards the words, the
principles of an organization (W.H.O.) that would
consider mass medicating a population with a poison
fluoride chemical that in world scientific
literature names those fluoride chemicals as Enzymes
inhibitors and destroyers!
Enzymes are the
engine of the human body and anyone wanting to add
this kind of poison to drinking water should be
banned in any community.
It is
scientifically dishonest if W.H.O. recommends
artificial fluoridation as safe, effective, and that
fluoridation qualifies in all statements and claims
in their above Ethical Criteria!
After reading the
above you may consider, ³enough said², but - there
is more.
The following W.H.O.
direction in their Criteria must surely be
especially directed at the Fluoride Mafia.
"All promotion -
making claims concerning medicinal drugs should be
reliable, accurate, truthful, informative,
balanced, up to date, capable of substantiation
and in good taste.
They should not
contain misleading or unverifiable statements or
omissions likely to induce medically unjustifiable
drug use or to give rise to undue risks.
The word SAFE
should only be used if properly qualified."
That word "safe" is
the most used and most popular expression by
Dentists, Doctors, Politicians, together with all
fluoridation promoters.
Strange democratic
science, when after 50 years of fluoridation in
Australia, and their prime selling ploy being - It's
safe, but to this day our requests for REAL
scientific proof of fluoridation "safety" published
in World Scientific medical Journals has NEVER been
produced (anywhere in the world).
Our Federation will
support every word of the W.H.O. Criteria as above,
and in its proper meaning, but any suggested
recommendations for compulsory artificial
fluoridation will be challenged by scientific
medical FACTS together with Australian Law.
Fluoride Spin
Doctors and "their" dental patients do not qualify
in any way under the W.H.O. Ethical Criteria on
drugs (fluoridation).
They are in reality
the modern sorcerers making gold out of their
garbage.
Come aboard the
Fluoride Timeless Dental Shuttle. It only goes
backwards into the darkness of unreality.
A study of this
Timeless Shuttle shows the beginning of artificial
fluoridation of water supplies was based on warnings
that wherever one lived in a non-fluoridated town,
that townıs community "had the worst dental decay in
the country", indeed sometimes "the worst in the
world". Hundreds of towns all around the world, all
with the "worst" dental decay!
That catch-cry,
called science by dentists, has been presented in
the
unfluoridated
places in Australia as a reason for compulsory mass
medicating the people with fluoridated drinking
water and all without scientific proof of its
safety.
Dentists in
Australia are claiming Switzerland took fluoride out
of their drinking water supplies and replaced it
with fluoride in salt.
It is disturbing to
read professional opinion that its good to eat
plenty of salt, and so get a daily dose of fluoride
from the salt. The simple TRUTH is universal medical
understanding that salt is not a good diet
constituent, so it seems "they" believe adding
another toxic fluoride chemical to salt makes it a
double-barrel magic bullet.
For many years the
Australian Fluoridation News has been challenging
the Fluoride Spin Doctors to show the daily
pharmaceutical dose of fluoride in all sections of a
community.
Now comes the 2005
dental "science", that suggests the same quantity of
fluoride is ingested by people in Switzerland from
table salt compared with fluoridated water.
It should be the
responsibility of the Government and its Regulatory
Agencies to control the spin science misinformation
delivered to the public via dental "experts".
The matter is a
simple equation. If compulsory mass medication with
fluoride chemicals via kitchen taps does not
succeed, it will result in the long-term world
planned control by drugs in public water being
defeated and the collapse of a mighty wealthy giant.
Copy List
|
