|
Copy List
The Health indemnity Game, Truth Bypass!
For many years Australian
people have been angered at their Governments passing Acts of Parliament
granting indemnity to those responsible for adding poisonous fluoride
chemicals into the drinking water supplies, especially when no scientific
evidence of safety is known world-wide.
Possibly acting on what
politicians consider "their" handsome moral and scientific victory over the
Australian population; compulsory artificial fluoridation indemnity to those
responsible, and to the absolute extreme 1993, altering the Constitution of
Victoria that now prohibits the Victorian Supreme Court "entertaining" cases
about fluoridation, plus the original Fluoridation Act 1973 also with an
indemnity to those responsible.
Now comes the great medical
game of following the leader, by rejecting responsibility and
accountability, for damage to humans by medical mistakes that harm patients.
The Litigation Bypass
The Age, 19th
September, 2001, "quote", "Doctors' groups believe that if more doctors
apologised to patients (dead or alive) for mistakes, the number of lawsuits
launched against doctors and hospitals would fall."
They will follow the old
excuse:
"Sorry, we did not know the
gun was loaded", so please forgive us we are sorry!"
"Doctors, lawyers and
health academics have been asked to come up with a range of approaches
that doctors could follow, to say sorry for mistakes, without the apology
being an admission of liability." (must protect the dollar)
Maybe fluoridation will
finish with just SORRY - "we were professionally, medically and
scientifically negligent, especially medically wrong. So sorry, consider the
matter closed!"
Hospital and medical errors
cost Australia up to $4 Billion a year, but surely the trauma, the grief
that multiplies accordingly cannot be costed in dollars, "only" to be
replaced with the medical cost of saying one word of 5 letters SORRY.
That is the health equation
of professional responsibility and accountability, causing such harm to a
misplaced trust.
When a doctor tells you
that fluoridation is safe, just ask, what about those 10% hospital care
patients that suffer an "adverse event" and the 80,000 unnecessary hospital
admissions each year in Australia, where patients are given wrong drugs!
If the medical profession
is guilty of such a magnitude of fluoridation is perfectly safe, especially
when they cannot produce medical evidence of such safety?
It seems SORRY is the
answer and the matter is closed.
The latest dental science from the
home of fluoridation U.S.A.
The U.S. National Institute
of Health has announced "fighting decay years before its starts" and claim
that new research is needed.
However, they admit
"cutting back on sugar will help against dental decay".
There is a scientific
conflict because 50 years ago the U.S. Nation was guaranteed there would be
no more dental decay after fluoridation, indeed the fluoride-lobby claim
that has already happened.
Reducing sugar intake seems
the ever recurring science of the fluoride-lobby befitting the
scientific standing and scientific understanding of dental decay and the
need for an excuse for the fluoridation failed concept.
Medical Journal Editors alarmed
Editors of the world's most
prominent medical journals are alarmed that drug companies are exercising
too much control over research results.
They have agreed to adopt a
uniform policy reserving the right to refuse publication of drug company
sponsored studies, unless scientific independence is guaranteed for the
researched material.
The major funders of
biomedical research in recent years are drug firms.
The Sydney Morning
Herald, 8 August 2001:-
"The editors said the
new policy was a response to companies' increasingly tight hold over how
research was done and, in many cases, over whether and how the results
were made public.
"Surveys of the
medical literature had shown that studies paid for by drug companies were
more likely than those with other sponsors to show results favourable to
the product tested, said Lisa Bero, a professor of clinical pharmacy and
health policy at the University of California at San Francisco.
Readers of Australian
Fluoridation News will know that the same concerns apply when there is a
relationship between fluoride-polluting industries and medical articles on
artificial fluoridation of public drinking water supplies.
Copy List
|
