|
Copy List
PUTTING THE TOOTHPASTE BACK IN THE TUBE
The difficulty of putting
the fluoride toothpaste back in the tube after its escape with your help,
and the Fluoride Genie out of the bottle, becomes an international health
hazard by those attempting to put them back where they belong, in the evil
history of fluoridation and fluorides.
You will never put the
toothpaste back in the tube but with your cooperation we can bust open the
tube with scientific pressure in spite of political, medical, dental and
media protection.
Interestingly, when
fluorides were first used in Australian toothpaste, the normal toothpaste
tubes badly corroded, resulting in different materials necessary to stop
fluoride corrosion.
Nothing can withstand
honest science, democracy and human endeavour, the day will come!
The desperate world-wide
coordinated fluoridation pantomime, with well known leading actors, both
professional and amateur, well paid and using their unique moral character
of talking without thinking, a kind of "he said so" and "they said so" like
trained parrots.
The honest days of
fluoride science disappeared when fluoride toothpaste packaging was allowed
to "remove" the "S5" POISON warning on the tube.
Consider the following data
published in the Journal of the American Medical Association 1936:
"Conclusion
Fluorine is one of the
widely distributed elements. It occurs in many funds in small amounts. It
occurs in many water supplies, and, in certain regions, its presence in
the water is the cause of mottling of the enamel of the teeth.
Fluorine is a general protoplasmic poison, but the most important symptoms
of chronic fluorine poisoning known at present are mottling of the teeth
and interference with bone formation.
It is virtually
impossible to avoid a small fluorine intake, just as it is virtually
impossible to avoid a small lead intake, but when the threshold value is
exceeded, as it is in drinking water containing one or more parts of
fluorine per 1,000,000 (1 p.p.m.) detectable signs of toxicity appear."
Before fluoride
commercialism superseded medical science, the official medical position was
openly documented in leading medical journals.
The Journal of the
Louisiana State Medical Society 6th June, 1957:
"The catch was, and
still is, the unwarranted assumption that this powerful chemical, in such
small doses, has no harmful effect upon other organs and tissues of the
body; while at the same time it is capable of profoundly affecting the
teeth, and in some unknown but supposedly harmless way, of significantly
reducing the incidence and retarding the pathological process of caries.
Just why fluoride selects only the teeth to thus favourably affect or
how this beneficial action by it is brought about have remained confused
or unrecognised."
The original medical
perception of a human fluoride safety threshold is illustrated in the
documented data by "UNICEF on Fluoride": "2001" (United Nations
International Childrens Emergency Fund)
"Fluoride in water:
An overview
Throughout many parts
of the world, high concentrations of fluoride occurring naturally in
ground water and coal have caused widespread fluorosis - a serious bone
disease - among local populations. We purposely fluoridate a range of
everyday products, notably toothpaste and drinking water, because for
decades we have believed that fluoride in small doses has no adverse
effects on health to offset its proven benefits in preventing dental
decay. But more and more scientists are now seriously questioning the
benefits of fluoride, even in small amounts.
"According to 1984
guidelines published by the World Health Organization (WHO), fluoride is
an effective agent for preventing dental caries if taken in 'optimal'
amounts. But a single 'optimal level for daily intake cannot be agreed
because the nutritional status of individuals, which varies greatly,
influences the rate at which fluoride is absorbed by the body. A diet poor
in calcium, for example, increases the body's retention of fluoride."
"Fluoride: good or bad for health?
Fluoride was first
used to fight dental cavities in the 1940's, its effectiveness defended on
two grounds:
Fluoride inhibits enzymes that breed acid-producing oral bacteria whose
acid eats away tooth enamel. This observation is valid, but some
scientists now believe that the harmful impact of fluoride on other useful
enzymes far outweighs the beneficial effect on caries prevention.
In many countries,
fluoride is purposely added to the water supply, toothpaste and sometimes
other products to promote dental health. It should be noted that fluoride
is also found in some foodstuffs and in the air (mostly from production of
phosphate fertilisers or burning of fluoride-containing fuels), so the
amount of fluoride people actually ingest may be higher than assumed.
It has long been
known that excessive fluoride intake causes serious toxic effects. But
scientists are now debating whether fluoride confers any benefit at all.
Fluoride ions bind
with calcium ions, strengthening tooth enamel as it forms in children.
Many researchers now
consider this more of an assumption than fact, because of
conflicting evidence from studies in India and several other countries
over the past 10 to 15 years. Nevertheless, agreement is universal that
excessive fluoride intake leads to loss of calcium from the tooth matrix,
aggravating cavity formation throughout life rather than remedying it, and
so causing dental fluorosis. Severe, chronic and cumulative
over-exposure can cause the incurable crippling of skeletal fluorosis.
Symptoms or
fluorosis
Dental fluorosis,
which is characterised by discoloured, blackened, mottled or chalky-white
teeth, is a clear indication of overexposure to fluoride during
childhood when the teeth were developing. These effects are not
apparent if the teeth were already fully grown prior to the fluoride
overexposure; therefore, THE FACT THAT AN ADULT MAY SHOW NO SIGNS OF
DENTAL FLUOROSIS DOES NOT NECESSARILY MEAN THAT HIS OR HER FLUORIDE INTAKE
IS WITHIN THE SAFETY LIMIT.
CHRONIC INTAKE Of
EXCESSIVE FLUORIDE CAN LEAD TO THE SEVERE AND PERMANENT BONE AND JOINT
DEFORMATIONS OF SKELETAL FLUOROSIS. Early symptoms include sporadic pain
and stiffness of joints; head-ache, stomach-ache and muscle weakness can
also be warning signs. The next stage is osteosclerosis (hardening and
calcifying of the bones), and finally the spine, major joints, muscles and
nervous system are damaged.
Whether dental or
skeletal, fluorosis is irreversible and no treatment exists. The only
remedy is prevention, by keeping fluoride intake within safe limits."
(Emphasis added)
We can categorically state
the only way of "keeping fluoride intake within safe limits" is to ban its
use on humans.
UNICEF highlights one
important aspect of chronic fluoride poisoning. Children have a "window to
the body their mouth and teeth" and mottled teeth is a clear barometer of
fluoride poisoning of cells in the teeth, but that barometer is restricted
only when teeth are forming in the child.
The Australian National
Health and Medical Research Council, in their publication "The Effectiveness
of Water Fluoridation 1991" stated:
"A greater prevalence
and severity of dental fluorosis is not only the first sign of toxicity
but has the advantage of being readily diagnosed.
"Hence, a substantial
increase in dental fluorosis would be sufficient grounds for concern over
total fluoride intake and would suggest the need for altering the
current pattern of exposure to fluoride vehicles."
They agree there is an
increase of mottled teeth but do not nominate the extraordinary increase,
not only in Australia, but world wide in fluoridated countries.
The latest inquiry into
fluoridation by the U.K. Government "2000" reported 48% increase in dental
fluorosis in children. That means just on half of the children are
poisoned with fluoride.
After tooth formation there
is no obvious indicator of chronic fluoride poisoning. Doctors and in
particular hospitals, do not routinely or ever, check patients blood or
urine for fluoride.
What or who prohibits such
an obvious necessary medical procedure? Why should this be kept a secret -
again read the Health Minister's Conclusions on deaths in hospitals through
doctors' errors!
What is excessive fluoride
intake?
That has been the centre of
medical debate from the very beginning of fluoridation.
There is no declared
human scientific threshold of fluoride toxicity which means there is no
known safe dose.
The dose differs enormously
caused by different people's thirst which, in reality, is the medical cum
pharmaceutical scientific dose control! The only such medical dose
control ever established.
Your politician expects you
to accept this scientific nonsense as "scientific fact".
We should go back to the
old National Anthem singing and praying - "God Save Australia".
The claimed dose alone,
indicates the lowest possible situation to which a Government can stoop, in
promoting fluoride drugs by compulsion without proof of safety.
No wonder they change
Laws and Constitution to protect themselves and their well endorsed fluoride
elixir!
Wednesday, 1st August, 2001
became a famous medical-Government history day. Australian State Health
Ministers announced after their meeting, the release of their document -
"Safety in numbers" (whatever that means).
This begs the question of
"safety" when that consortium of Australian heads of State Health
Departments, representing and responsible for the health of every citizen of
Australia, failed to consider the common denominator, fluoride, as a health
risk by compulsory drugging of all people every day via all kitchen taps
with an unproven safe drug.
Their Report states their
plan is to "reduce the extent and massive financial cost of medical
errors, doctors and nurses and hospitals will have to provide comprehensive
reports on mistakes that harm and kill thousands of patients every year."
Medical errors in hospitals
1997-1998 contributed to the deaths of "almost 5400 Australians".
What kind of industry are
we financing and accepting?
It was reported that
Professor Barraclough, Chairman of the Committee stated:
"There's anything up
to 80,000 unnecessary admissions to hospitals a year because of adverse
drug events." (The Age, 2nd August, 2001)
Frightening statement when
the Australian Therapeutic Goods Administration, refused to follow most of
the world in forcing packaging of fluoridated toothpaste to print a warning
about the health hazards of fluoride toothpaste.
The U.S. Food and Drug
Administration made it mandatory:
"... requires fluoride
toothpaste to carry the health notice - Warning: Keep out of reach
of children under 6 years of age. If you accidentally swallow more than
used for brushing (whatever that amount is), seek professional assistance
or contact Poison Control Centre immediately."
The world followed
except Australia.
The Sunday Age, 29th June
1997, quoted this author:
"President of the
Victorian Anti-Fluoridation Association (A.FA.) said the U.S. ruling was a
strong dis-endorsement of fluoride and A. FA. supports claims that
fluoride was dangerous to humans."
The Anti-Fluoridation
Association and The Freedom From Fluoridation Federation of Australia
presented, 30th March, 1998, submissions to the Therapeutic Goods
Administration on the matter but were ignored in favour of submissions from
the fluoride toothpaste manufacturers.
Why should Australia not
join all the scientifically advanced countries in such a matter of human
health!!! Ask your politician.
An earlier Government
Report had estimated the medical mistakes contributed to 18,000 patients
deaths a year and (50,000), fifty thousand cases of permanent disability.
The Victorian Minister for
Health, Mr John Thwaites, was reported:
"I think there's a
clear demonstration that we want to do better and reduce errors and
improve safety for patients."
That Health Department
under Mr Thwaites, endorses artificial fluoridation as safe, which is
contrary to his latest statement suggesting "safety" when he endorses
fluoridation as "safe" without any knowledge of the forced daily fluoride
dose of fluoride per person in the community, and pharmaceutical proof of
the safety of sodium silicofluoride.
Perhaps the fact of
fluoridation Government promotion, is all disclosed in the published
statement relative to the Health Minister Conference.
"There is no standard
national structure for mandatory reporting medical errors."
Some people say doctors
bury their mistakes.
However, there are
Australian mandatory laws of compulsory drugging 80% of the Australian
population, with an uncontrolled and unknown daily dose of a poisonous
fluoride pollutant collected from fertiliser factories, a waste by-product
tat is delivered into every kitchen compliments of your political
representative, and his political party, together with the endorsement of
the Australian Medical Association.
The mechanics of political
gobbledegook is illustrated in a report on 29th July, 2001 in the
Herald-Sun:
"More than 500 reviews
and inquiries ordered by the Government during the past 20 months."
The continuous health
fluoridation questions sent to Government, have little opportunity of
entering that 500 important reviews, which include, "a review into the cost
of flowers for Government Offices, strategies for controlling blackberries
and the suitability of bathing boxes on Mt Martha Beach etc., etc."
Pretty heavy stuff that
keeps the wheels of Government moving and their allotted priorities in the
inner sanctum where the word fluoridation is banned.
Copy List
|
