|
Copy List
Murphy's Law of Fluoridation
By Glen S.R. Walker
Governments in Australia (politicians), the
A.D.A., Medical Groups and a consortium of dentists, have collectively
exploded in the media with claims, so old, so unproven, so unscientific,
that the only heading for such fluoridation data is Murphy's Law.
Contrary to "hands on hearts" integrity,
which we should expect, politicians, doctors, dentists and their fellow
travellers, are claiming that when fluoride chemicals are added to water
supplies, the following will occur.
The Fluoridation Covenant
(1) There will be no more dental decay.
(2) Dentists will be out of work (Hansard).
(3) Their altruism is to be admired (Hansard).
(4) There will be no further use for school
dental clinics or dental hospitals.
Now Murphy's Law infiltrates that solemn
fluoride Covenant of Parliaments (politicians) and the dental profession.
Current official dental data on Australian
children's teeth, documents an increase of at least 22% dental decay (A.I.H.W.
2003) .
Possibly the prize example of dental
fluoride Murphy's Law is the fact that since fluoridation commenced in
Australia, there has been an increase of over 80% of dentists (NB. allowing
for population increase).
But there is more!
Current official data documents an
increase of 22% in dental decay!
A.I.H.W. 2003
Murphy's Law is the enemy of fluoridation
pushers and their fellow travellers. Government Laws in general are, by
design, couched in veiled legal terminology, only to be understood by the
legal profession, BUT, Murphy's Law is open public property of
responsible honest facts.
The Fluoridation Covenant does not record
(recognise) any variables, it just blatantly states fluoridation stops tooth
decay, carefully inferring this one sole medical, pharmaceutical process is
the medicine for all people without qualificiations or exceptions - safe and
effective for all people, babies, young children, sick and healthy, on other
medication with or without teeth, THE ONLY MEDICINE EVER PRESENTED WITH SUCH
MYTHICAL UNPROVEN CLAIMS.
Murphy's Law is a simplistic fluoridation
fact, so simple that anyone, even politicians, should be able to understand,
if permitted.
With the introduction of fluoridation, not
only the explosion in the number of dentists, the sales of toothpaste and
toothbrushes proliferated in their own explosion of a necessity to stop
tooth decay.
A necessity that was not mentioned as
important at the introduction of compulsory artificial fluoridation, but
because of a secret important factor to support the fluoridation myth.
The sales of toothbrushes and toothpaste
incorporating "the wonder poison drug fluoride," exploded after
fluoridation, plus an Australian wide education in schools and the public
media, especially TV promoting the important necessity to clean children's
teeth.
With the introduction of fluoridation,
an explosion in the number of dentists, sales of toothbrushes and
toothpastes and school and media education campaigns on dental care.
To obtain data on these items is difficult
compared with other products recorded at The Australian Bureau of Statistics
(A.B.S.).
Increase of 300% in toothbrush and
toothpaste sales after fluoridation.
However, the following proves Murphy's Law
on and its official claims.
Between 1960‑1976, the early days of
fluoridation, the production of toothpaste and toothbrushes increased by
300% in those 16 years!
The current data from the A.B.S. shows
toothpaste increasing at about 10% per year and from 1960 these increases
coincide with the introduction of fluoridation in Australia.
The Home of Fluoridation, the U.S.A., shows
similar statistical supporting PROPS to cover the fluoridation myth.
In 1981, it was reported in Chemical
Week that "Toothpaste is big business", sales annually in the U.S.A.
were $700,000,000; all helping to prove the benefit of fluoridation.
The Australin Dental Association on
fluoridation, early 2002, ignored Murphy's Law, when, in their fluoridation
dossier sent to all Victorian politicians, they stated:
"Water fluoridation Reduces Tooth
Decay
Item 1. Over 1,000 studies in
more than 20 countries have shown tthat water fluoridation reduces dental
decay, caries, in both children and adults.
Item 2. he cost of dental
treatment in Victoria is over $400 million.
Item 3. To reduce the risk of
dental fluorosis parents should supervise tooth brushing of children under
age 6 years, and apply only a smear of toothpaste."
That "smear only of toothpaste" amounts to
a 99% reduction of fluoride in toothpaste entering into a child's mouth,
compared with 1,000 parts per million as previously recommended.
Remember Mrs Marsh on television promotion
of toothpaste use by children!
Why this enormous (99%) reduction of
fluoride entering a child's mouth?
Simply because fluoride is so toxic, it can
poison a child and affect the teeth.
In their 1985 booklet on scientific reasons
to prove the safety and effectiveness of fluoridation, the National Health
and Medical Research Council (N.H. and M.R.C.) stated (p.17):
"There is nothing in the current
evidence to necessitate the introduction of measures to limit the volume
of toothpaste used by young children."
Their recommendations were -
"(1) Brush under parent supervision.
(2) Encourage children not to swallow
the paste."
That is the text of Australia's highest
scientific health experts the N.H. and M.R.C., from where the Governments of
Australia take their knowledge and instructions on health matters.
Today's recommended reduction of 99%
of fluoride in toothpaste for children.
Since that N.H. and M.R.C. recommendation
in 1985 for no change to the fluoride content in toothpaste for children 18
years have passed, and in this year 2003, that excellence of dental‑medical
science has been superseded h% tool‑. recommended 99% reduction of fluoride
in toothpaste for children.
Murphy's Law of more fluoride, more health
problems, more fluoride ‑ more decay, more people living off the
fluoridation myth.
Murphy's Law of Health Statistics ‑
The official dental data of decayed,
missing, filled teeth of 12‑year‑old children in State and Territory of
Australia 1990-1999.
Be your own judge. Study the dental graph
of ever moving, yo-yo, dental effect of child dental decay in fluoridated
Australia. Decide in your own mind if this official data shows a
scientifically honest effect of fluoridation "stopping tooth decay" in a
flowing rate of scientific proof of effectiveness as claimed especially in
the A.C.T., the prize community of dental propaganda.
Note that between 1990‑1993, three years,
the decay rate of "fluoride protected teeth" were performing like a circus
trapeze, plus all the other illustrated situations NOT performing in a
proper medical‑dental requirement to show conformity in statistical claims,
of effectiveness.
The graph shows fluoridation living up to
its reputation as a medical‑dental case of Russian Roulette.
The graph shows fluoridation living up
to its reputation as a medical‑dental case of Russian Roulette.
After 60 years of world fluoridation
propaganda, claims that no other medical process would ever pass Government
Health Regulations plus the enormous taxpayers' Billions of Dollars expended
world-wide on an unproven process based on forcing communities to daily dose
themselves with an unregistered industrial poison waste product that is
registered in all countries as a potent poison for humans and animals.
The first "ever" fluoridation plant in the
world was commenced in Grand Rapids, U.S.A. during 1945, "a present" to
returned World War II veterans, getting something for nothing from the
Governments, a fluoride shandy of drinking water ‑ "that will result in the
end of tooth decay."
The Grand Rapids fluoridation experiment
was officially stated by the U.S. Health Department as "a ten year
experiment with fluoridation", without community consent and mostly
without knowledge.
That 10 year fluoridation experiment would
officially finish in 1955, after which reports and scientific documents
would follow showing the results of this first experiment with fluoride
chemicals added to a drinking water supply.
The U.S. Health Department may think
themselves clever but fade into insignificancy compared with the Australian
National Health and Medical Research Council (N.H. and M.R.C.).
That Australian Health Organisation was
recommending compulsory artificial fluoridation for Australia, 2 years
before the first ever study of public fluoridation experiment was completed
and the 10 year data was documented in scientific literature.
Here we have an example of pure Government
fluoridation propaganda all without official scientific evidence.
The Minister of Health proudly and indeed
openly "dobs" in the Government Health exclusive health advisor, the N.H.
and M:R.C. from where all top medical decisions are made on behalf of the
Australian people.
The N.H. and M.R.C. first recommended
fluoridation in 1953. That important (to whom we are not sure) fluoridation
commendation was made in the Australian Federal Parliament in answer to Dr.
Everingham's question No. 4828 (Hansard).
$5.89 million spent in Melbourne to
try to secretly prop up the guarantee that fluoridation would stop dental
decay.
Ignorance is recognised by law as no excuse
for particular actions. The Minister of Health and his important Health
Department, of which the N.H. and M.R.C. is part, should be aware of FACTS
before making serious health recommendations.
Murphy's Law is the more "they" claim in
favour of fluoridation, their mistakes multiply, but never official
constitutional accountability.
Fluoridation propped up
In the year 1977, when fluoridation
commenced in Melbourne, it was hailed by the fluoride traveller as the end
of dental decay and the reduction of dentists and dental costs to the pubic
to zero.
By a strange, "not hailed"', coincidence,
The Age newspaper, 19th November, 1977, published a report from
Canberra stating the Commonwealth had provided a grant to "Victoria" of $1.8
million for a school dental scheme.
The same article also announced the
Commonwealth would supply $3.89 million for the year and that the Victorian
Government is contributing $2 million.
Murphy's Law exposes that with fluoridation
to all homes in Melbourne, it was necessary to spend $5.89 million to try to
secretly PROP UP the guarantees that the fluoridation would stop dental
decay.
Murphy's Law ‑ millions of dollars for
dental treatment after fluoridation.
Later, the Victorian Government Health
Department supplied coloured placards for dentists to display on the
footpath outside their business rooms.
The PLACARD in large colour print advised
passing parents that:
"There is a better way to stop tooth
decay, Have sealants on your children's teeth."
On 8th October 2002, the Victorian Minister
for Health, John Thwaites, M.P., stated:
"Fluoridation remains an effective and
important means of improving the dental health of the community
regardless of age, social or economic status and which scientific
evidence has shown to be safe." (Emphasis added)
A mouthful of unproven scientific claimed
facts.
Regardless of Age?
Throughout Australia during 2003, protests
in every State and every town, were set-up calling on their Governments for
relief from present waiting times of 4 years for dental service irrespective
of urgency.
Social and economic status
The latest Review into fluoridation was
York University on behalf of the U.K. Government.
That York Review found no evidence that
fluoridation gave special benefit to disadvantaged people, indeed the more
disadvantaged the more dental decay.
That Review found no evidence of
fluoridation safety, but it did find the quality of dental literature on
fluoridation of a very low scientific standard.
Murphy's Law is a clarification of the
Great Freedom Robbers suffering FFB, fluoride fuddled brains.
Copy List
|
