|
Copy List
A rort that will haunt Fluoridation Promoters
How to mislead the public
- Government manual
The Australian Government has
admitted they print a manual of instructions on how to mislead the public on
questions and requested data.
To admit such a scandalous
evasive tactic of shoring up their rorts of practice, is nothing new to any
person dealing with Governments on fluorides and fluoridation.
The instructions to
bureaucrats and politicians is to ignore the necessary requirement of
precision in science and indeed moral standards of those in responsible
positions of trust.
The media reported the Public
Service Manual included:
"Advice on how to
introduce false issues, stall for time, discredit associations feign
ignorance, give ultimatums and provide biased information."
Surely that sums up the
fluoridation rort in crystal clear terms.
Democracy by deception
it's today's way of
"responsible" attitudes, dwelling on "mind games", in preference to honest
science, democracy and the will of the people, together with the RIGHT of
the people.
Trouble follows the ragged fluoride trail
Strange? not really,
especially when the media, forgetfully allows a snippet of truthful news and
items on fluoride and human health to slip into the daily news.
A double barrel assault on the
fluoridation dogma
-
"Residents in
fluoridated Toronto, Canada, have double the fluoride in their hip bones
compared with non-fluoridated Montreal."
-
Toronto has been
fluoridated 36 years, yet Vancouver, which has never been fluoridated has
a cavity rate lower than Toronto. (Dr.
Harvey Limebeck, Head, Dept. of Preventive Dentistry, University of
Toronto, Past President Canadian Association for Dental Research.)
From the U.S., the home of
fluoridation, comes this scientific hoax that feeding poisonous industrial
waste fluoride pollutant chemicals to the population will stop tooth decay
and put dentists out of business. This has created the past 60 years
scientific and moral manipulations to cover an unproven and failed medical
concept (medical concept, not a medical discovery).
Recently, "year 2000", the
following invitation was extended from California:
"You are welcome to use
all or any part of the following report in your own response to the
flagrant misrepresentation of facts contained in the nation wide report on
a dental epidemic that is supposedly occurring in California, but is aimed
at every non-fluoridated community on the continent (or the world).
You might want to use
this example of proven distortion to ask the question of why the promoters
would have to resort to a trumped up study if the credible science proving
their case is available.
Recent reports of an
epidemic in tooth decay in California children is a prime example of
science by press release. No viable study shows that California children
have more dental decay than the rest of the nation."
As you read those quotations,
you will think you are reading Australian news.
The 1994 Study ($620,000)
cited as proof of this tooth decay epidemic, has never been published, and
until recently, has never been peer-reviewed, even though the conclusions
have been reported around the world for more than 5 years.
The California Oral Health
Needs Assessment was performed by Dental Health Foundation under a sole
source contract. Dental Health Foundation was formed in 1985 for the stated
purpose of fluoridating California.
A review of the Study was
undertaken by Councils, herewith a few of their resulting statements.
"Escondido City Council
member, Marie Waldron, states: This is a classic example of manipulation
of science to prove a case. This Study in effect compares non-poor
children in fluoridated communities, with protective sealants on their
teeth, against poor children in head Start programmes in
non-fluoridated communities, with no sealants on their teeth. Who
are we kidding here?
They told us we didn't
need to look at science, that we should just trust them!
The Study design clearly
states that the study sample is not representative of all California
children, nor representative with respect to randomness or distribution
across races, economic levels, geographic regions, etc. nor collected
blindly, without prior knowledge of a child's fluoridation status."
(Standard dental study procedure).
The Oral Health Needs
Assessment was intentionally non-published, non peer-reviewed, expensive
study that they expected not one of us without a background in science
would want to read. So they offered summarising bullet points and glossy
brochures to our Council and evidently to many others throughout the
State, as proof that we should convert our precious water supply into a
delivery system for special interests, forcing those, who cannot afford
bottled water, to drink industrial waste fluoride every day of their life,
- "Not here said Waldron. "
Sections of Government and
once again the public kept ignorant of the real chemical health hazards of
fluorides in water and the atmosphere.
Change the names of Cities and
Councils, you can match the data with every fluoridation promotion
world-wide past, present and future. - It's so big in $$$, the new chemical
symbols.
There seems a huge gap in
fluoridation and fluoride research into the possible catalytic action in the
human body as well as known poison in the human system and the possibility
of acting as a catalyst on ingested toxins that may increase, or be
incorporated into an unknown toxicant caused by fluorides consumed every day
from fluoridated water in so many different concentrations.
It is known that ingested
sodium fluoride can change in the body to Hydrofluoric acid depending on the
pH of a person's gut, but little medical knowledge of what follows.
Aluminium cannot be produced
without fluoride chemicals, most of which finishes in the chimneys, some
collected and the balance into the atmosphere. Petrol and petro-chemicals
cannot be produced without the fluoride catalyst, just to name two enormous
industries depending on fluoride chemicals.
MERCK INDEX
Hydrogen Fluoride.
Use: Catalyst,
especially in the petroleum industry (paraffin alkylation); in fluorination
processes, especially in the aluminium industry; in the manufacture of
fluorides; for separating uranium isotopes; in making fluorine contg.
plastics; in dye chemistry.
Sodium Fluoride
Use: As insecticide,
particularly for roaches and ants; in other pesticide formulations;
constituent of vitreous enamel and glass mixes; as a steel degassing agent;
in electroplating; in fluxes; in heat-treating salt compositions; in the
fluoridation of drinking water; for disinfecting fermentation apparatus in
breweries and distilleries; preserving wood, pastes and mucilage; manuf. of
coated paper; frosting glass; in dental laboratories.
Vet. Use: Poultry lice;
roundworms of swine. Dose: swine 1 % in dry feed.
Sodium Silicofluoride.
Use: In enamels for
china and porcelain; manuf. opal glass; as insect exterminator and poison
for rodents; mothproofing of woolens.
Vet. Use: Cattle and
poultry lice.
Perhaps the above can be
labelled chemical factories depending on the use of fluorides in their
production.
"No perhaps" when each person
realises they have the most amazing chemical factory of all time processing
fluoride chemicals.
Nature sets up human chemical
factories where the ingoing, by choice or accident, is processed and either
accepted or rejected accordingly but fluoride being an industrial catalyst,
it may also act in a similar manner in the human body, producing an action,
reaction, interaction, or a catalytic action producing unknown toxic
production of tragic conditions, unseen, unknown and never studied,
especially as medical science agrees 50% is retained in the body.
As a known catalyst, can you
agree with medical opinion that the fluoride retained in the body is quite
inert? Maybe it is a catalyst causing many human health problems.
The end result depends upon
the formula of your intake and its progress through your chemical factory,
but remembering, your factory has limits that can vary considerably between
people of all ages and the consumable toxic fluoride products.
As the doctor said - "Drink
plenty of water", and enjoy the above chemicals, or maybe you are one of the
many who use only good bottled water or use a household filter that rids the
water of fluoride chemicals.
The great fluoridation paradox
From the actual beginning of
fluoridation, over 50 years ago in the U.S.A., and Australia from 1953, with
48 years of experimenting on its population, a paradox has emerged in the
"true" fluoridation science of dentistry.
Part of the ongoing false
fluoridation propaganda has been the "dental altruistic" patronage by
dentists in their claimed charitable annihilation of the dental profession
by supporting compulsory fluoridation that they claimed would stop dental
decay and put dentists "out of work".
There were no limits, nor are
there still, to this misinformation. The apathetic public of Australia
accepted that dental fluoridation propaganda without one moment of
consideration into its scientific or professional validity.
Even in the Parliaments,
politicians voiced their endorsement of that false propaganda,
congratulating the dental industry on their selfless altruistic action "on
behalf of the Australian people."
Government files on this
subject would be difficult to find in accordance with every other
scientific, honest aspect of questions about fluoridation.
It is often questioned where
all the letters and submissions on fluoridation are stored. Do they go into
the "In" basket or the "Out" basket or maybe the "Too Hard" basket with its
automatic shredder attached?
Today, the scientific dental,
political and media fluoridation bubble of hot air and fluoride
misinformation has burst.
The Graduate Destination
"2000" Survey of Graduate Starting Salaries published their Report.
Partly on that report, prompted our title - "The Great Fluoridation
Paradox".
Those poor unemployed dentists
who sacrificed their income for the grand "altruistic" fluoride reason will
be interested to know Dentistry today is enjoying the "Top Earnings" of all
the Graduates salaries.
Scientific history and honesty
develop dangerous situations and come back enlightening the population to
historical scientific rorts, perks, propaganda and straight-out dishonest
claims affecting the public.
The Graduate Study
The "Top Earners" of the
ten professional graduates.
"Dentistry - Salary $50,000
Percentage in work -
Australia 95.9% Victoria 94.4%.
Apart from medicine the Dental
graduates enjoy the highest income and employment.
Many of the original parroting
fluoridation propagandists, promoting and parroting the dental, personal
altruistic sacrificial action, for the benefit of automatic freedom from
decay by fluoridation, have disappeared into the "sunshine" for their
endeavours into the introduction of a bogus failed, scientific medical
process claiming the end of dentists because of fluoridation.
The actual truth is that
dental decay and dentists are proliferating together, especially the serious
mottling of children's teeth caused by fluoride.
Once again Fluoridation has
imploded but the general public and scientific fields consider the only
"positive" in fluoridation is that your elected politician will do nothing,
as usual.
Scientific truth about
fluoridation and its promotion are facts unwanted, unknown by Government and
their politicians in privileged positions of trust, supposedly devoting
their time and energy to "the will of the people." (Pigs derriere)
Copy List
|
