UPDATED

02 MAR 06

Copy List

Greetings to all human toxic waste disposal units

These salutations and appreciation come from the worlds consortium of fertiliser factories producing super-phosphate, and to a lesser decree aluminium smelters, all struggling for their share of the mighty dollar.

The original 1951 stockpile of fluoride waste materials was produced by Alcoa U.S.A. and advertised by Alcoa Chemicals:

"Fluoridate your water with confidence. Use Alcoa Chemicals."

That advertisement was 4 years before the first ever human fluoridation experiment at Grand Rapids U.S.A. was completed. It was planned to run for 10 years from 1945.

The producers and their collective followers of poisonous fluoride factory chemical pollutant waste by‑products, collected in the factory exhaust chimneys, are the modern covert sorcerers, the reincarnation of the old U.S. Wild West medicine men with their guaranteed snake‑oil human elixir. Above all others, they are today's modern alchemists, turning their garbage fluoride chemicals into gold, with the supreme support of politicians of all persuasions.

Enormous tonnage of potent poison waste product cleaned out of fertiliser factory grounds by adding to drinking water supplies

Just imagine and try to understand the enormous tonnage of that potent poison waste product you are helping to clean out of fertiliser factory grounds. Melbourne alone helps by dumping 1,000 tonnes every year into its drinking water supplies. A simple exercise in multiplication throughout Australia will identify the Australian Government's help to the fertiliser industry, seemingly it preference to community health.

You must be reasonable, they say, there is nowhere else m the world that this fluoride waste product is allowed to be dumped, except into your drinking water.

Laws are made by politicians, world‑wide, prohibiting the dumping of this poisonous fluoride chemical into rivers, lakes, seas, oceans or even general land fills.

It is so toxic to humans and not and not allowed to escape out of the exhaust chimneys and from within which it is collected. It would cause a human disaster if allowed out into the atmosphere.

The same actual political people arrange through "other laws", permission, indeed encouragement, to dump this same fluoride material into the drinking water supplies of the U.S.A., U.K., Australia and New Zealand (not anywhere in Europe), making it a compulsory daily drugging of those populations via their kitchen taps, all without a democratic alternative or any legal recourse.

Fifty per cent of all ingested fluoride chemical is retained in the body

Without exception, one can find medical, pharmaceutical, dental and Government literature explaining that 50% of all ingested fluoride is retained in the human body (yet nature is sufficiently wise to make sure that a mother's breast milk is free of fluorides).

Consider the amount of this toxic fluoride chemical accumulating in each person's body over a lifetime, and finding governments (politicians), health ministers and their departments, doctors and even universities seemingly not interested. A case of professional solidarity.

Fluoridation and fluorides must not be attacked.

The extent of medical ignorance, or lack of interest, abounds in other rules where doctors in hospitals do not test patients blood or bones for fluoride accumulation caused by a lifetime accumulation of an unnatural chemical as used in fluoridation, Sodium Silicofluoride a waste product from industry. Yet other often less toxic chemicals are tested.

Not only a waste by‑product but a chemical not registered as safe for humans in any dosage (F.D.A., E.P.A., U.S. Senate). A very selected chemical with no equal ever in the world.

Before fluoridation these fluoride toxic chemicals were primarily used as rat poison and insecticides.

"Fluoride is partly excreted by humans," the fluoride pushers use this as an "excuse", they state ‑ "50% of fluoride ingested by humans is excreted," (as if the remaining 50% of this toxic poison is OK!).

They also ignore the medical fact of enormous differences in human metabolism especially in many different situations, and scientific knowledge documents that the excretion of fluoride is governed by the efficiency of a person's kidneys, which depends on the health of each person, and the fact that kidney efficiency decreases with age and particular health conditions of a person (High Court, Edinburgh, 1980).

The above draws serious attention to the question of, "where do these medical experts get a figure of 50%", when so many medical variables exist, all of which signposts the need for some honest scientific pharmacology relating to fluoride in the human body relative to the fluoridation daily dose that also differs enormously.

Hospitals do not test patients' blood or bones for fluoride accumulation.

Why is there a medical ban on testing patients' blood and bones for accumulated fluoride? Our Association receives calls from doctors pleading for us to do fluoride tests on blood samples which is not available to them in Australia.

The scientific medical equation is a simple question ‑WHY, is this not a genuine, necessary medical procedure?

It is well documented without argument that fluoride attacks bones and tissue, so an accumulation of at least 50% ingested fluoride, stored in the body means, and one does not require the use of M.D. after their name to understand this matter, we have an unknown amount in our bode of such foreign poisonous fluoride material. This is nonsensical pharmacology, to say it causes no harm because "they " do not know the total fluoride stored in each bode and seemingly do not want to know. They do not know the daily dose of any person!

Read the daily newspapers about medical University news that groups are doing research in matters of absolute non-importance. With agreement in every fluoridation inquiry throughout the world, there is an unqualified conclusion that, "more research is required".

The unwritten rules seem to give notice to young aspiring researchers that fluorides and fluoridation are taboo.

The claimed benefits and safety‑ of fluoridation are similar to the Heads of State in U.S.A., U.K., Australia and New Zealand telling everyone about Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction (mass distraction).

It is the story of fluoridation claims by the same Big Three, on behalf of each country's people, no proof, but a handsome commercial health propaganda exercise all based on zero facts and zero science.

But that is the 2003, "State of Democracy".

It is nonsensical pharmacology to say accumulated fluoride causes no harm when the total fluoride stored in the body is not known.

The question surfaces as to why only the English speaking countries use and promote this mythical failed fluoride mass medication? The whole of Europe has dismissed any interest in fluoridation!

Compare Europe's scientific state of excellence with the U.S.A., U.K., Australia, forcing by compulsion all their Army, Navy and Air Force personnel to drink only fluoridated water, all without scientific proof of any benefit to their teeth (Correspondence Defence Minister).

Conclusion

As fluoridation has failed its benefit (Australian Institute of Health and Welfare ‑ A.I.H.W. - 2003) that makes our politicians look rather foolish - on democratic principles only, the reason most people wish should be respected.

Copy List