UPDATED

02 MAR 06

Copy List

The Real Story of Fluoridation

By Glen S R Walker

FLUORIDATION PROMOTION

The original Australian fluoridation decision and still current, backed by Acts of Parliaments, was claimed scientifically doubtless, a promise by politicians, advised by "dental experts" and universities plus the Australian Dental Association (A.D.A.), Australian Medical Association (A.M.A.) and National Health and Medical Research Council (N.H. and M.R.C.).

They promoted (compelled) fluoridation as scientifically conquering dental decay and perfectly safe for people of all ages and differing states of health.

There were no scientific variables, fluoridation with its daily medical prescription dose, controlled only by each individual's thirst, was scientific and pharmacology perfection in medical history (Centre for Disease Control) and taught in all universities as such.

Fluoridation from every scientific and medical perception was infallible, illustrated by data presented by Parliaments and their Members, Health Departments, dental and medical hierarchy, universities, A.D.A., A.M.A., and of course from its source, The Fluoride Lobby, where the fluoride chemical abounds in endless bulk, only permitted to dump into drinking water supplies. No other dumping permitted - too toxic.

So! the picture is exposed or overexposed accordingly. The fluoride chemical you are forced to daily drug yourself with, 24 hours a day, in your own home, is so toxic it is not permitted, by Law, to dump into the ocean, seas, rivers, lakes or normal land fills.

By kind attention and honest representation of its people, your local politician decides to dump it into your drinking eater, delivered into every home, without political or legal recourse or permission.

The people of Australia have NEVER had the constitutional provision of a vote on this matter. "The right of the people". Why are politicians so afraid?

The population was told how fortunate they were to have mountains of waste toxic fluoride chemicals in sufficient quantities to indefinitely "serve" the world's drinking water supplies.

All that was necessary, was for an international Think Tank to continually develop masterful fluoride propaganda, for world distribution, propaganda that would destroy any written word, all opposition, person or group.

We do not claim in any way there is no benefit from fluoridation, BUT there is no benefit to the public's health.

The fluoride chemical you are forced to consume is so toxic it is not permitted to be dumped into the ocean, rivers or normal land fills.

To those who "must obey", we might have the answer tc beneficiaries from fluoridation!

In the "Big League of Drugs" there are general instructions or suggestions to authors, salesmen, promoters, in all disciplines to always gain an unassailable fluoride presentation, focussed on children.

The Fluoridation Think Tank has taken full advantage of the principle of child emotional appeal to parents, by saturating the "free" media with their dental altruism, sacrificing their income and dental employment, quoted in Parliament that fluoridation will reduce work for dentists (Hansard).

That is one of the greatest political and sad dental "jokes" of the century.

The dental intelligentsia has professionally distinguished themselves in their claimed doctrine of dentists' altruism, by supporting fluoridation, and thus making themselves unemployed, closing University Dental Schools, no longer producing dentists, therapists, hygienists, nurses, dental hospitals and school dental clinics closed, as there will be no dental decay!

The absolute opposite is the FACT, these have all increased.

Few seem to care, particularly parliaments, cloistered up with the people's representatives, supposedly processing in a democratic way, "The will of the people", and the Constitution with a sprinkling of commonsense and honesty.

The dental "fantasy" is churned out unabated, medically, politically, Halls of Pharmacology, A.M.A., A.D.A., Liberal and Labor Parties, National Health and Medical Research Council, and all Government Health Departments, State and Federal, throughout Australia together with all the universities.

Try and obtain an answer to a letter about fluoridation stating factual scientific published evidence against the drug.

HEALTH DATA

To keep the reader on line, the following is official, dental health data:

"Australian Health 2000"; by Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra.

"The Seventh Biennial Health Report of The Australian Institute of Health and Welfare" (Publication 2003)

Page 46:

• Heading the list as No. 1 (worst) health condition in Australia is dental caries, showing dental decay as the highest (worst) health condition.

Under "prevalence"; "caries is the worst health condition in Australia, 19,014,000 decayed teeth" (no percentages given).

• No. 3, "top of the list" is EDENTALISM in Australia with 1,396,700 people affected, equalling 7.6 percentage of the population.

• No 5, "top of the list"; PERIODONTAL DISEASE "in Australia with 1,027,200 people affected, 5.6 per cent of the population."

The dental problems "rate", 1st, 3rd and 5th, out of 25 serious health conditions in Australia.

Out of 25 serious health disease conditions in Australia, dental problems rate first, third and fifth.

Australian Health 2000, Aust. Institute of Health & Welfare, Canberra

The above Official Report of BAD Teeth ,was highlighted throughout the Australian media, but lasted only one day; with no follow‑up editorial, or one health section of the newspapers.

The official health conditions in Australia, dental caries, edentalism, periodontal disease were only worthy of one day's exposure to the people of Australia.

It would be interesting to know who makes such a judgement with control of vital dental information, even if it clashes scientifically with non‑scientific fluoridation claims and those those associated accordingly.

There seems no chance this section can also be altruism regard for others), whoever they may be, but certainly not for the people of Australia.

Data that must not pollute the airwaves of the media, the press and electronic avenues of entertaining and educating. Truth ‑ the lost community.

Swiss Stop Fluoridation because of harm

On 9th April, 2003, The Great Council of Swiss Basel­Stadt, on a motion brought forward by the Commission of Health and Social Issues, stopped their fluoridation plant after 41 years experimenting on their people.

Their official reasons were documented and printed in The Australian Fluoridation News, May/June 2003.

This was an important health action in a World Capital of pharmacology.

The given reasons by the Swiss were:

"(1) No scientific proof, after 41 years, that fluoridation stops tooth decay.

(2) Dental caries increasing in fluoridated areas.

(3) The danger of fluoridated water for babies and its effect on fluorosis of bones.

(4) Less than 1 % of fluoridated drinking water is used for children.

(5) Fluoridation pollutes the environment, a very undesirable imbalance."

This is official fluoridation information of harm to the human body, relative to compulsory fluoridation piped into most Australian homes.

In documentary detail the above Swiss information was sent to every Australian daily newspaper, and many others.

Official fluoridation information of harm to the human body

Commission of Health and Social Issues, Basel‑Stadt, Switzerland

None would print such damaging evidence against the Fluoridation Lobby, the Parliaments, doctors, dentists, A.D.A., A.M.A., the N.H. and M.R.C., all involved in promoting and guaranteeing (all without proof) the fluoridation sham, a failed medical concept of professional and political mismanagement.

Dosing every person with a fluoride chemical, Sodium silicofluoride, that is not a refined medicinal chemical and NOT REGISTERED as safe for human consumption as a medicine, otherwise called fluoridation.

Report of U.S. Food and Drug Agency (F.D.A.) and E.P.A. to the U.S. Senate 2001

The question asked was ‑ Does the E.P.A, have scientific medical documents that prove sodium silicofluoride, as used in fluoridating drinking water supplies, is safe for human consumption?

The same question was put to the F. D. A. who stated they have no scientific evidence proving Sodium Silicofluoride safe for humans. They also stated they (F.D.A.) have never had an application for such proof.

The Environment Protection Authority (E.P.A.) followed by stating they have never seen documented scientific evidence of sodium silicofluoride human safety in fluoridation.

Never seen documented scientific evidence of sodium silicofluoride human safety in fluoridation.

Environment Protection Authority, U.S.A.

Fluoridation is the protected illegal Government drugging of people with an unrefined poisonous compound, UNREGISTERED for human use, but REGISTERED in POISON SCHEDULES of every country as a potent poison, a crude industrial toxic pollutant, collected from fertiliser factory exhaust chimneys, with no use except dumping in drinking water supplies, and such action supported by people in privileged responsible positions of political trust.

Fluoridation is a "medicine" by official qualification of the Therapeutic Goods Administration, National Drugs and Poisons Schedule Committee, August 2002.

Pharmaceutical medicines for humans must be made from Pure Chemicals, especially labelled "Chemically Pure" but this is blindly ignored by medical practitioners, Government regulatory authorities and responsible health departments, with no question from your parliamentary representative member. A crude quality chemical for Government prescribed medicine (tap water).

The question is frighteningly simple!

Compulsory artificial fluoridation with an unregistered industrial crude grade quality, sodium silicofluoride, that is REGISTERED as a poison in all countries' poison literature, forced into every home with no redress ‑ a style of totalitarian government, unbecoming of a democratic country.

The final question of scientific honesty. During July 2003, U.S. Professor of Chemistry, Dr. Paul Connett visited Australia, was seen on TV, heard on radio and delivered public lectures on the harm from drinking fluoridated water.

In particular, a politician, aggressive in his way of condemning the fluoridation qualifications of Professor Connett to speak out against fluoridation, got good publicity space in newspapers. That senior politician was invited to the lectures by professor Paul Connett, with an open invitation to speak on the same platform, and debate fluoridation accordingly, especially to support the evidence of his public claims.

HE NEVER APPEARED!

The political state of the art in fighting truth.

Dentists, doctors, local members of Parliament, were invited to "just listen" or debate if they wished.

NONE TURNED UP ‑ such a quiet lot of men and women in responsible positions, until Professor Connett goes home!!!

The Fluoridation Adage ‑ never come face to race with an opponent of fluoridation, never debate the matter, don't answer letters, but make a big fuss in the protected sanctuary of politically immoral parliaments often labelled "Cowards' Castle"

Fluoridation claims are as credible as turkeys voting for Christmas and the story of no tooth decay caused by fluoridation, is similar to looking for weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; confronting terror of truth and science.

The health of people must not be confused with the financial rights of industry owners and their agents.

An explosive raft of fluoridation misinformation, all unsubstantiated scientific claims, pushing the mythology of fluoridation and dentistry, hit the media and received enthusiastically by editors. Letters to the contrary were ignored.

That is the New World Order for your children.

It is up to you to do something, why not?

Copy List