|
Copy List
Living in a Democratic Fluoridated
Country
Reliance, compassion and true
representation from elected members of Parliament is history and survival of
democracy will rest with the people. Margaret Mead once stated:
"Never doubt that a small group of
thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed it's the only
thing that ever has."
The way is open, but the responsibility
rests with you. Even back in 1940 that theme seemed paramount in the mind of
King George VI in his message to the people - he quoted Louis Huskins' words
that fit today's political problems.
"I said to the man who stood at the gate
of the year ? give me alight that I may safely tread into the unknown".
The A.D.A. Journal 1985 stated:
"Fluorides have become a pervasive
component of our environment." But is that pervasion accompanied by wisdom
and truth?
John Lear, Science Editor, Saturday Review,
4 January 1964, stated in an article on fluoridation:
"We take medical remedies only as long as
we are sick. When sickness subsides, we stop the medicine. Why do
otherwise with fluoride, which does no demonstrable good outside the mouth
and is known to be capable of much harm elsewhere in the body."
The fluoride disciples, the great followers
of non-scientific modern medicine-men, are lead to believe their mentally
developed armadillo fluoride policies are safely and secretly stored in an
impregnable cocoon that keeps truth and opposition from the people,
concerning fluoride health dangers. Sadly, the impregnable cocoon is
becoming a reality especially with help from the elected politicians who sit
in parliament to misrepresent the people especially those living outside
that protected cocoon.
The time is November 1994 and the Victorian
Parliament is about to rise for their summer holiday but business comes
first and they must pass the amendment to the Fluoridation Act by changing
the Victorian Constitution to stop the Supreme Court of Victoria from
hearing cases against fluoridation. The Parliament recessed, and "the
elected" politicians departed with satisfaction and pride that changing the
Victorian Constitution was done without any opposition or indeed any debate
on the ethics of such a foul and unnecessary new law of protection for
compulsory fluoridation. The fluoride die has been cast in the Victorian
Government and democracy thrown out with the previous clean drinking water.
On 28 December 1994, Dr W.G. Hart, Manager
Health Protection, Public Health Branch, wrote officially in a letter -
"With respect to compensation the
Department does not accept liability for alleged damage caused by water
fluoridation and will not support any claims for compensation."
Yes, Dr Hart is manager of "Health
Protection" Health Department of Victoria. It was thought that the outspoken
Civil Rights people would challenge such evil political action by tampering
with the constitution, but "somehow" the lid was quickly put on such a
possibility, so much for their cheap public rhetoric on freedom.
Maybe such political actions become part of
a universal fluoride plan because following the Victorian Parliament's
draconian action, the Tasmanian Government went one step further to kill
democracy and freedom of the people in their State (1995). The Tasmanian
Parliament passed a Bill through the Lower House to prohibit the holding of
meetings on the subject of fluoridation ? this included private, public,
councils, legal parties, schools where education is supposed to be taught,
indeed anywhere in Tasmania.
The "Consequential Amendments Bill" was
based on a special clause declaring fluoridation of public drinking water
supplies as an "Issue of Significant Interest". It sure is! Do you believe
the changing of the Victorian Constitution and the proposed Tasmanian Act
prohibiting public debate on fluoridation has anything to do with children's
teeth? The Health Minister of Victoria said the alteration to the
Constitution was because "fluoridation is important" and not one member
asked "what does the Minister mean by important".
As we go to press we have been told the
Tasmanian Bill has been withdrawn and will be reworded. Why? Because the
people of Tasmania will not stand such childish nonsense by those they
placed in responsible positions of trust. Seems science, medical
professionalism, parliamentary responsibility, common sense, and indeed
reality has disappeared into a mist of fluoride polluted water minus all the
values that once adorned the hallowed halls of parliament and the public
arena. The international fluoride bank must be empty of propaganda with
nothing to draw on so they now rely on our politicians to do their dirty
work seemingly knowing the Government will oblige without any dissent or
reference to the people. As there is no accountability required, they are on
safe ground.
Copy List
|
