Welcome to FluoridationFacts.com, incorporating the Australian Fluoridation News Archive and HREX fluoride-related files.

Please note: This website is mostly inactive. The nature of this website will also change to an archive-cum-database for out-of-print magazine articles, dental health data and related publications, and scientific literature. The Australian Fluoridation News has also moved to another server based in Australia. However, the 'AFN' will be backed-up on this website on a regular basis. The Webmaster, 7th August, 2005.

About Us

Contact Us

Useful Links

Translation

Site Map

Infodocs

Opinion Polls

Pictures

Propaganda

Unethical Con.

News Centre

Press Release

Political

Register

Dental Data

Forums/Reviews

Papers

Statements

Aus F News

Copy List

HREX

UPDATED

02 MAR 06

Ad-Rate:4

Homepage

Education

Infodocs

f01

f02

f03

f04

f05

f06

f07

f08

f09

f10

f11

f12

f13

f14

f15

f16

f17

f18

-

-

f09: How much does water fluoridation cost?

Between the financial years 1985/86 and 1992/93, the cost to the Treasury was as follows;-

 

Financial year - Central Fund expenditure in £,000's

Regional Health Authority (RHA)

85-86

86-87

87-88

88-89

89-90

90-91

91-92

92-93

Totals for RHA

Northern

 

3

38

 

55

 

 

113

209

Trent

 

105

 

8

 

245

54

535

947

N/W Thames

 

 

 

 

75

 

 

 

75

Oxford

 

14

 

 

 

 

 

 

14

West Midlands

 

251

385

936

300

 

 

135

2,007

North Western

20

 

10

10

 

 

42

11

93

Yorkshire

 

 

 

 

 

 

12

 

12

Mersey

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

102

102

Totals

20

373

433

954

430

245

108

896

3,459

Note:  Figures include funding towards feasibility studies, reports and or capital costs of schemes. (Source: Written Answers, Hansard, 13th January 1994).

The total expenditure for this period is £3,459,000 from the Treasury's 'Central Fund' alone (NB. For a small percentage of the population only).

However, water companies who implement fluoridation schemes obtain full financial reimbursement from the Health Authority responsible for the application. The Health Authorities in turn obtain only part of the funding from central Government. So the question is: what percentage does the above table represent to the total cost of fluoridation?

A clue lies in the letter sent by the Department of Health & Social Security to the West Midlands Regional Health Authority in February 1982. The letter gives the following table of estimated costs for WOLVERHAMPTON AND WORCESTER schemes;-

Year

Proposed capital expenditure

RHA commitment

Grant from Central Funds (CF)

%CF

82/83

£350,000

£325,000

£25,000

7.14

83/84

£740,000

£550,000

£190,000

25.7

84/85

£821,000

£625,000

£196,000

23.9

85/86

3315,000

£250,000

£65,000

20.6

86/87

£2,226,000

£1,750,000

£476,000

21.4

This table shows that only about a fifth to a quarter of all costs for fluoridation schemes comes from Central Funding. This in turn means that a total of approximately *£16 million pounds would have been spent over an eight year period implementing or maintaining fluoridation schemes (*calculations are based on the first and second tables - £3,459,000 divided by 21.4%).

The next calculation to consider is how much water is used by industry and how much in the home. Estimates on industrial usage can vary significantly.

Industry can take between 40 to 80% of all supply but only the lower figure will be used in the following formula.

Water usage

Formula

Results (ltrs)

Notes

a. in homes @ 60%

18,000 / 58 (millions)

310.34482

[1]

b. by industry @ 40%

(310.34482 / 60%) - a.

206.89654

[2]

c. total

a. + b.

517.24136

[3]

d. physically consumed

a. x 2% 

6.20690

[4]

e. children under 18

d. x 23%

1.42759

[5]

f. fluoride retained

e. x 50%

0.71379

[6]

NB. Figures based on 100% fluoridation of a population.

Notes

[1] Water UK states that the water industry provides about 18,000 million litres of water to 58 million people, per day (domestic customers).

[2] The amount of water used by industry (water company claim and using lowest estimate).

[3] Total amount of water provided by water companies.

[4] Water physically consumed (drinking, cooking, etc.) as opposed to other usage (washing machines, washing up, bathing, etc.).

[5] Based on commonly agreed principal that only children are supposed to benefit from drinking fluoridated water. The child population of England & Wales is approximately 23% based on estimates from the Office of National Statistics.

[6] The average amount of fluoride retained by the body.

Conclusion

Of the 517.24136 litres of water provided by water companies each day (based on single user consumption and including industry percentage usage), only 1.42759 litres reaches it's intended target (children under 18).

This simply means that by dividing 517.24136 by 1.42759, the actual percentage of any 'use', is 0.276% of total supply.

Consequently, 99.724% of fluoridated water is wasted (where water is 100% fluoridated).

Alternatively ...

For every £100 spent on fluoridation, only 27.6p worth is physically consumed by children. Of this 27.6p worth, about 13.8p worth will be excreted. Of the remaining 13.8p, only a proportion of this amount will reach developing teeth.

Do you think this is a good way to spend money? Would you be prepared to spend £100 on a product when you knew in advance that at least £99.72 would be wasted?

Q. SO HOW MANY £10's OR £100's MILLIONS OF POUNDS OF TAXPAYER'S MONEY WILL BE SQUANDERED ON THE GOVERNMENT'S PLAN TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF FLUORIDATION SCHEMES?

A. PERHAPS YOU SHOULD ASK THE PHOSPHATE FERTILISER INDUSTRY HOW MUCH IT WOULD COST THEM TO DISPOSE OF THEIR HIGHLY TOXIC DISCHARGES VIA OTHER ROUTES. PERHAPS THE INDUSTRY MAY BE ABLE TO TELL US HOW MUCH MONEY THEY HAVE SAVED THEIR SHAREHOLDERS.


TRANSLATION | EDUCATION | NEWS | POLITICAL | SCIENCE | AFN | HREX | ABOUT [fluoride.org.uk] | CONTACT | LINKS | SITE MAP