|
Press Release 012
#012 - For immediate release
BEGINS:
Time for the media to support Belgian Bravery and abandon the
sanitised science of Big Brother
Just a few days ago, an explosive statement on the safety of fluoride was
made by the Belgian Health Minister, Magda Aelvoet.
The initial response of the media was to report the facts as they
appeared. But the greatest danger to the truth is yet to come from the
media.
Despite some claims of unbiased reporting on the issue of the safety of
fluoride, it is often noted by this source that when referring to dangers
from fluoride, the warnings are usually referred to as "claims" rather than
established science or proven facts.
Conversely, and in typically true Big Brother fashion, the establishment
in general is often given the benefit of the doubt inasmuch that their
'claims' are usually portrayed as established science or proven facts.
Fluoride.org.uk has 11 years of experience of the study of fluoride and
fluoridation. And it's not just the science, but also the politics, the
corruption and the trickery of the pro-fluoride lobby has been exposed on
this website.
For example, fluoride.org.uk has exposed, or showed:
- That teeth damaged (pitted, stained, etc) by fluoride are counted as
SOUND in UK dental health surveys.
- That the UK Governments own sponsored review of fluoridation
deliberately omitted important evidence on the dangers of fluorides, as
well as manipulating certain findings and results. The severity of dental
fluorosis is just one example.
- That improvements in dental health in fluoridated districts are due
mainly to factors not related to fluoridated water. Furthermore, large
improvements in dental health have been demonstrated on numerous occasions
in NON-fluoridated districts.
- That the science of fluoride is subject to intimidation.
Whistleblowers who have exposed the links between fluoride and cancer,
brain damage, etc., have been blatantly victimised for speaking out.
- That the vote to fluoridated UK's water supplies in 1985 was RIGGED.
The Government Bill was supposed to be a 'free vote' but a two-line whip
was used to intimidate anti-fluoridation pay-roll MPs.
- That pro-fluoride campaigners who make misleading claims about
fluoride often run shy of open debates with qualified scientists. As
Professor Paul Connett has frequently stated: "They [the supporters of
water fluoridation] argue like parrots and defend like chickens."
IT IS TIME FOR THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA TO BEGIN TO REPORT THE CREDIBLE FACTS
BEHIND THE 'FLUORIDE CONSPIRACY' AND TO EXPOSE THE DECEIT AND TRICKERY OF
THE PRO-FLUORIDE LOBBY.
UNTIL THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA DOES ACT AND REPORT MORE RESPONSIBLY, IT WILL
REMAIN A 'PATSY' [OR POODLE] FOR THE UNSCIENTIFIC, UNPROVEN, CORRUPT,
MISLEADING, FRAUDULENT AND DISTORTED VIEWS OF THE BIG BROTHER ESTABLISHMENT.
ENDS.
|
