|
|
|
Against Page 1 |
| Picture? |
Who? (Why?) |
 |
Dr Albert Schatz, , Ph.D., Honorary
member of the Scientific Society of Chile, the Chilean Society of Pediatrics, The Academy of Oral Dynamics (USA), the Stomatological
Society of Greece, etc. Also a Fellow of the Royal Society of Health in
Great Britain. |
 |
Dr Sheila Gibson. Researcher, Glasgow
Homeopathic Hospital. |
 |
Dr Tony Lees. Dentist who has spoken
and written on the dangers of fluorides (fluoridation, toothpastes,
etc.). |
 |
Glen Walker, Author of Australian
Fluoridation News. |
 |
Dr John Yiamouyannis, Biochemist and
author of book: 'Fluoride - The Aging Factor'. |
 |
David Blunkett, MP, New Labour Party.
Personally opposed to the anti-democratic use of compulsory medication. |
 |
Margaret Cooper. Runs the National
Register of Children with Dental Fluorosis. |
 |
Phyllis J. Mullenix, Ph.D.,
Pharmacologist and toxicologist. Former Head of the Toxicology
Department at the Forsyth Dental Center, a world renowned dental
research institution affiliated with the Harvard Medical School. |
 |
J. William Hirzy, Ph.D., USEPA. Senior
Vice-President, National Federation of Federal Employees Local 2050,
P.O. Box 76032, Washington, DC 20013. |
| n/a |
Richard G. Foulkes, B.A., M.D. "The
theory that dental caries and fluoride levels have an inverse
relationship is false. The "experimental trials" that have been the
basis for fluoridation have been shown to be invalid, and, possibly,
fraudulent. Dental caries have declined in developed countries
independently of fluoridation. Studies of large numbers of school
children show no significant difference between those living in
fluoridated areas compared to those in either partially or
nonfluoridated areas." Re: Signed Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/foulkes-aff.htm |
 |
Dr. Paul Connett, Professor of
Chemistry. BA (Hon) in Natural Sciences from Cambridge University
(1962). Ph.D. in Chemistry from Dartmouth College, NH. (USA) 1983. |
 |
Albert W. Burgstahler, Ph.D. "... it
is my best professional judgment that, in the light of what we now know,
clear evidence of harm and a lack of provable dental benefit make
continuation of fluoridation both unscientific and unjustifiable." Re:
Signed Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/burgstahl.htm |
 |
A.K. Susheela, Ph.D., F.A.Sc., F.A.M.S.,
Professor of Histocytochemistry. 20 years doing scientific research in
the field of Fluoride Toxicity and Fluorosis. Chief of the Fluoride and
Fluorosis Research Laboratories, at the All India Institute of Medical
Sciences, New Delhi. "I am absolutely certain that large numbers of
persons all around the world are suffering from Fluoride Toxicity, to
one degree or other. The various and frequent health complaints, caused
by fluoride ingestion, are often (or invariably) over-looked due to
unawareness at all levels, which include the health professionals or,
perhaps, due to the prevailing ill conceived, unscientific notion that
"fluoride is good for teeth." Fluoride is potentially a dangerous
chemical and a poisonous substance, which does no good to the human
body. Re: Signed Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/susheela.htm |
 |
Dr. Robert Carton, Ph.D., former head of
EPA Employees Union, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C.
"It is my best judgment, reached with a high degree of scientific
certainty, that fluoridation presents unacceptable risks to public
health, and that the government cannot prove its claims of safety." Re:
Signed Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/carton-a.htm |
| n/a |
Dr. William Marcus, Ph.D., D.A.B.T.,
epidemiologist. "COVER-UP AT THE EPA. A subsequent letter written to
my second line supervisor stated, "If ... there is a risk of cancer no
matter how small the potential number of deaths per year will exceed
many thousands". This, as well as my original memorandum, was so
compelling that EPA management decided that no reputable scientist
within EPA could publicly state these concerns. When I continued to
speak out against this politicalization of science, and the lies and
cover-up I had witnessed, my dismissal from the EPA was engineered.
Judge Clarke in his decision of December 3, 1992 so eloquently stated,
"I conclude that the reasons given for Dr. Marcus' firing were a pretext
and that his employment was terminated because he publicly questioned
and opposed E.P.A.'s fluoride policy." The official line in Washington
has been "fluoride is good", and all evidence to the contrary has been
and is being ridiculed, denied, distorted or suppressed. Re: Signed
Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/marcus2.htm |
 |
Dr. John Colquhoun, Ph.D., D.D.S.
"It is my best judgment, reached with a high degree of scientific
certainty, that fluoridation is invalid in theory and ineffective in
practice as a preventive of dental caries. It is dangerous to the health
of consumers." Re: Signed Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/colquhoun.htm |
 |
John R. Lee, M.D. "Fluoride has no
known metabolic function that fulfils the category of "essential" for
humans. The National Academy of Sciences, in their 1971 book FLUORIDES,
Chapter 5, called "Is fluoride an essential element?", answers with a
"NO". The federal Register, since 1979, no longer classifies fluoride as
"essential or probably essential"." Re: Signed Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/lee.htm |
| n/a |
George Waldbott, M.D.
Author of a number of books on fluoride. |
| n/a |
Dr. H. Moolenburgh. "It is my
considered scientific opinion, and I speak in the name of my colleagues
who joined in this research, that the fluoridation of water supplies
gives a significant immunosuppression of the whole population subject to
it, and is one of the important precursors of the civilization illnesses
that are rampant in modern industrialized society." Re: Signed
Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/moolenb.htm |
 |
Philip R.N. Sutton, B.D.Sc. Before
retirement: Senior Lecturer in Dental Science in the Dental School of
the University of Melbourne, for eleven years. Also a Senior Research
Fellow of the University of Melbourne for nine years. "Dental
fluorosis. This condition, formerly called 'mottled teeth', develops in
approximately ten percent of children who drink fluoridated water during
the period of tooth formation. It is a permanent disfigurement which can
be alleviated only by expensive dental treatment. In its mildest form it
is seen as 'ghastly white' (Black, 1916) spots or areas on the surface
of the teeth (called 'pearly white' in the pro-fluoridation literature).
More affected teeth also have areas of brown staining. This condition is
often dismissed by pro-fluoridationists as merely cosmetic, but some
people are very ashamed of their ugly appearance and this can lead to
marked psychological problems. (In one case I encountered, the
psychiatrists attributed the attempted suicide of a young child to shame
resulting from this condition)." Re: Signed Affidavit, [www] rvi.net/~fluoride/sutton.htm |
|
